|
|
#21
07-25-2007, 09:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
[ QUOTE ]
um, the person who posted 200 & 400nl. you do realize that what you posted is BB and not PTBB. you are only making <4PTBB. [/ QUOTE ] this is incorrect [ QUOTE ] you could make 8PTBB in 100NL if you picked like the top 2-3 tables from multiple sites. if you play on 1 site and play 8+ tables 8PTBB is unsustainable and no 50k isn't a good sample size. the OP's post is stupid anyways, you call 4 BI swings variance? thats not even close to high variance. thats like standard. [/ QUOTE ] this is correct. 1) the stats posted are probably from a site that does not accept US players 2) on sites that do accept US players, there are a handful of players at each level from NL100-NL400 that have played 100K+ hands since the legislation @ 8ptbb/100+ (i.e., < 5). it's not impossible, it's just practically impossible. 
|
|
#22
07-25-2007, 03:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
[ QUOTE ]
um, the person who posted 200 & 400nl. you do realize that what you posted is BB and not PTBB. you are only making <4PTBB. you could make 8PTBB in 100NL if you picked like the top 2-3 tables from multiple sites. if you play on 1 site and play 8+ tables 8PTBB is unsustainable and no 50k isn't a good sample size. the OP's post is stupid anyways, you call 4 BI swings variance? thats not even close to high variance. thats like standard. [/ QUOTE ] You are indeed wrong, if it was in bb I would be at 16bb/100 or something. And it is a Party poker graph. But I've heard in MSNLH that the full tilt 2/4 and pp 2/4 are pretty much the same. Seems to be more fish on Party but weaker regs on Full Tilt. Never tried it tho cause it would be such an hassle to move my bankroll from sites. Who knows, maybe I was being leveled.
|
|
#23
07-25-2007, 03:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
Anything over 4ptbb/100 at NL100+ FR is pretty good assuming your playing >8 tables.
|
|
#24
07-25-2007, 03:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
[ QUOTE ]
8ptbb/100 is impossible? are.you.serious. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I beat NL100 for >10 ptbb/100 over my first 11k+ hands (edit: 12 tabling, LDO), and I'm quite certain I'm awful at NL. [x] limidonk proving that NL is easy?
|
|
#25
07-25-2007, 04:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
Also OP thats not low variance, this is low variance
My last 35k hands. 
|
|
#26
07-25-2007, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Low Variance NLHE...Huh what\'s that? (Graph Included)
[ QUOTE ]
Also OP thats not low variance, this is low variance [/ QUOTE ] Yeah I was being sarcastic about the low variance part. If I would stop tilting so bad and quit trying to force people to fold obvious overpairs then it wouldn't be so full of variance.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
