**8 table - Thread***

[DonkeyOnTilt]

I 4-6 table. I find that with 6 tables my reads suffer greatly and that with 4 tables my attention can sometimes wander. 5 is sort of my sweet spot right now but I think that 4 is still optimal for me.

That being said it is all just a matter of practice. When I first started 4 was out of the question, let alone 6. Just work your way up if thats what you want to do but don't just open 8 and go to town.

[Jamougha]

[ QUOTE ]
NL50 is really where people start to put you on ranges and test your cbets frequently instead of playing fit or fold on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude they don't even do that at 400NL. You're imagining [censored].

[mookboi]

[ QUOTE ]

Dude they don't even do that at 400NL. You're imagining [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

QFTmotherfuckingTruth!! Sorry, dreal drunk right now, but I remember reading this [censored] and being like "lolz, the donks just gimme dey money at 50NL tee hee hand ranges"

[ICMoney]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NL50 is really where people start to put you on ranges and test your cbets frequently instead of playing fit or fold on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude they don't even do that at 400NL. You're imagining [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

It's amazing how often I wander back and forth between these two opinions.

IMO, aggression is noticeably higher at nl50.

[TheRenaissance]

[ QUOTE ]
You need like 1500 to be rolled for 8 tabling 25nl.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol wtf?
level?
if you need 60 buyins to play 25nl you got leaks the size of something really really big. like a planet. or michael moore.

[notontilt09]

I'm currently 12-tabling 50nl, running about a 18/10, and making a little over 5bb/100. The play here is still so typical, but there is definitely a difference from 25nl...

every time i've taken a shot at 100nl, i've 12-tabled right off the bat, which i guess is a bad thing as i'm not used to the swings.

Dropping down tables when moving up seems like a very good idea