|
|
#12
10-13-2007, 07:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: boring deep stack question
alright, told ya it was boring in the title atleast.
i just wanted some comments on what villains range might be here since i was villain and stuff. i was bluffing ofcourse. complete air. K:hearT:J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. pretty much everyone i talked to agreed that it was a pretty spewy play. i guess it would have been more interesting if i doctored the hand and gave him A4 or something like that. at the time i thought villains range was pretty polarized to 56 etc/made hands turned bluffs since i def thought he would raise a set on the flop like always (dynamics were pretty aggro at the time) and i thought he would bluffraise the ace a great deal of the time since i was playing so aggressive, firing at any scare card all the time. i think i would have liked my play with spades or 65, but drawing dead whenever called is pretty disastrous. 
|
|
#14
10-13-2007, 12:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: boring deep stack question
Ok I'll admit I don't get this at all. Why is this a snapcall? Because we think he's shoving worse for value? Not enough back and he's shoving any hand he's continuing with here? Our line looks bluffy? Certainly the last can't be enough reason to SNAPcall, I don't think there's anything wrong with value raising this but folding to a shove, the call in that case would be player/history dependent. I'd appreciate it if someone wants to explain here or shoot me a PM.
|
|
#15
10-13-2007, 12:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: boring deep stack question
[ QUOTE ]
Ok I'll admit I don't get this at all. Why is this a snapcall? Because we think he's shoving worse for value? Not enough back and he's shoving any hand he's continuing with here? Our line looks bluffy? Certainly the last can't be enough reason to SNAPcall, I don't think there's anything wrong with value raising this but folding to a shove, the call in that case would be player/history dependent. I'd appreciate it if someone wants to explain here or shoot me a PM. [/ QUOTE ] If "Villain" had a monster, he probably wouldn't bet-3betAI. Give a little more rope. Combine that with the fact that there are bloody few monsters on this board, and he's very likely to be getting out of line.
|
|
#16
10-13-2007, 12:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: boring deep stack question
lol wtf u dont think i shove pawket rawkets here? thats insane
|
|
#17
10-13-2007, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: boring deep stack question
So Villain's representing one (1) combo ftw?
|
|
#18
10-13-2007, 03:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: boring deep stack question
luego-
i was under the impression that villain frequently would smoothcall a set on the flop my b
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
