|
|
#31
09-28-2007, 06:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?
i aint no HU player, someone liking the bluff in hand 2, could you explain it to me please? Because I don't atm, but again I'm no HU player.
|
|
#32
09-28-2007, 06:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?
after you float the flop in hand 2 and the turn is a club and after you fire out 300 on turn, is it a reasonable statement to say that you should be pushing this river practically all the time, regardless of which card comes
|
|
#35
09-28-2007, 07:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?
number 1 will work if opponent is on a bit of a cold run and is making folds more often than he usually does.
if he is on a hot streak or having a nightmare session and is semi-tilting/pissed off he will call. (assuming he has mid pair), note obv you cant know how his other tables are going, so you just got to hope. hand 2 is nearly impossible to read given the infinite hand range of your opponent. if you've seen him fold to your good hands, then make this play, otherwise be patient and get paid off with a good hand.
|
|
#36
09-28-2007, 10:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?
[ QUOTE ]
honestly hand 1 is pretty bad i hate pf then i hate flop then i slightly dislike turn then i think river is pretty meh hand 2: looks ok [/ QUOTE ] Is flat calling IP the new 3-bet? A few months ago people would say 3-bet to anything when you're IP, but now 3-betting here is horrible. As a side questions, what hands would you think are ok to 3b here pre-flop? low suited connectors? Only premiums? Complete junk? I can't understand how 3betting TJs here is horrible at all, so if anybody would like to elaborate why it would be a bad play I would appreciate it a lot!
|
|
#37
09-28-2007, 10:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] honestly hand 1 is pretty bad i hate pf then i hate flop then i slightly dislike turn then i think river is pretty meh hand 2: looks ok [/ QUOTE ] Is flat calling IP the new 3-bet? A few months ago people would say 3-bet to anything when you're IP, but now 3-betting here is horrible. As a side questions, what hands would you think are ok to 3b here pre-flop? low suited connectors? Only premiums? Complete junk? I can't understand how 3betting TJs here is horrible at all, so if anybody would like to elaborate why it would be a bad play I would appreciate it a lot! [/ QUOTE ] It depends on the type of villain.
|
|
#38
09-28-2007, 11:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?
plzzz it isn't bad to 3-bet JTs IP.
|
|
#39
09-28-2007, 11:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] #2 worked, without a doubt. [/ QUOTE ] no way in hellll #2 worked [/ QUOTE ] no way in hell either worked imo
|
|
#40
09-28-2007, 11:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Fun with JTs, which bluff worked?
i like number 1, not number 2. i think that villain is c/c'ing with 9x or TT+ a lot of the time here. i would check the turn and bet the river. getting c/r'ed here would really suck.
1 looks good because he has a pp here a lot that he'll fold. edit: i mean on hand 2 you should check the turn with the intention of bluffing river. as played i would check river.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
