#1
|
|||
|
|||
$4/180 Standard reraise with zero FE?
The blinds just went up. I have no fold equity. Is this a good enough hand?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t100 (9 handed) Poker Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) UTG+1 (t3590) MP1 (t2995) MP2 (t1395) MP3 (t2435) CO (t2460) Button (t1865) Hero (t916) BB (t3865) UTG (t1990) Preflop: Hero is SB with T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, MP3 calls t100, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to t400</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t916 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4/180 Standard reraise with zero FE?
I'm ok with this, your probably not getting a better hand in time to do any good.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4/180 Standard reraise with zero FE?
We're 52% against top 20, getting odds, and looking to double up. I am stressing first in vigorish quite a bit lately, but we have to gamble soon, this is a purdy hand, instaJam.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4/180 Standard reraise with zero FE?
eh, probably doesnt matter much, i think you can still argue for folding but i dont think youre giving up much in a low buy in mtt-sng by doing this readless.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4/180 Standard reraise with zero FE?
If CO was the open raiser, I'd jam. But with the limper in also, you could be in a 3-way pot here and that's something that you probably want to avoid since it severely limits your chances of winning.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4/180 Standard reraise with zero FE?
[ QUOTE ]
eh, probably doesnt matter much, i think you can still argue for folding but i dont think youre giving up much in a low buy in mtt-sng by doing this readless. [/ QUOTE ] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $4/180 Standard reraise with zero FE?
[ QUOTE ]
If CO was the open raiser, I'd jam. But with the limper in also, you could be in a 3-way pot here and that's something that you probably want to avoid since it severely limits your chances of winning. [/ QUOTE ]Agreed, also CO's range should be much tighter because of the limper. I'd fold if I don't have a read that he raises limpers light alot. |
|
|