|
View Poll Results: Whats OPs hustle | |||
Is a pro UFC fighter | 8 | 11.94% | |
Is gay, will distract young with sexy gams | 21 | 31.34% | |
Has a KNIFE | 12 | 17.91% | |
young=already dead | 10 | 14.93% | |
is expert at ba-su tado martial art styleeee | 16 | 23.88% | |
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Introduction to Five Tools Analysis: Hitting
[ QUOTE ]
Hey Kyleb, great stuff! 1) I thought you were more into pitching than hitting, so it surprises me that you're a hitting coach and not a pitching coach. What gives? 2) What's your opinion on the Moneyball idea that tools/scouts are largely irrelevant and all you need is a player's stats? (Also, does anyone else read his name as Kyleb (Ky-Leb) instead of Kyle B? Or am I the only idiot?) [/ QUOTE ] 1) I love pitching, but over the last year or so, I've learned that I can pick up hitting a lot easier. It makes sense and is much easier to explain, study, and practice. I'll do a short bit on pitching later on as well. 2) That's not really the Moneyball idea, but I see why people get that feeling based on Lewis's book. I believe what a player has done (stats) is more important than what a player can do (tools), but too much reliance on stats will lead to the Blue Jays Syndrome - getting a ton of low-ceiling low-variance players in your farm system without any impact players. Drafting mainly college kids with emphasis on what they have done rather than what they can do will lead to a farm system that produces a high percentage of players to make AAA/MLB, but a low percentage of All-Stars. Drafting mainly high school / foreign kids with emphasis on tools rather than what they have done will lead to a depleted farm system that produces a low percentage of players to make AAA/MLB, but a higher percentage of All-Stars. You need a blend of both to succeed. |
|
|