|
|
#11
10-20-2007, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: pokerstars-mail...HU SNG\'s
It would be nice if SNG tables that filled didn't drop off the list for like 5 seconds also. It is kind of irritating trying to join a new table when it isn't back on the list yet.
|
|
#13
10-21-2007, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pokerstars-mail...HU SNG\'s
Rematch button should be the number 1 concern, for obvious reasons - this is worth WAY more than 6% ROI/hr or however you want to measure the lost minute.
It is one of the few things that UB has going for them. Then they can consider the Im Ready button, crappy disconnect rules and other bits and pieces like multiple HU tables on each buy in (at least the common ones) so its easier to game select and reg in general.
|
|
#14
10-21-2007, 01:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pokerstars-mail...HU SNG\'s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] FTP has an "Im Ready" button I think thats ideal. [/ QUOTE ] And UB has the "rematch" system. Why can't stars just adopt both of these? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why can't stars just adopt both of these? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why can't stars just adopt both of these? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why can't stars just adopt both of these? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why can't stars just adopt both of these? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Why can't stars just adopt both of these? [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#15
10-21-2007, 04:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pokerstars-mail...HU SNG\'s
Did any one see the Stud forum?
In the 100/200 games they increased the antes to $25 and the Bring in to $50. This is for the explicit reason that the bad players play too loose. The winning players wrote a letter, and Stars response was "we'll see how it goes." If the fish bust out later and the winners have a smaller edge then Stars won't bother changing, even though this game is nearly a crap-shoot. Well, it is beatable, but at the cost of a very large bankroll.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
