|
|
#61
03-13-2007, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
And TWP, using that hand to call talentedtom a fish is [censored] ridiculous. Definitely not a fish, probably bigger winner than you from what I've seen. [/ QUOTE ] I have 700 hands with you. Not sure how many hands you have with TT. Of course it's possible that I'm mistaken and he's actually a good player (maybe even better than I am). But that's not my impression from the hands I have played with him thus far. Obviously not just from that one hand. That was just the first one I found in PT where I thought he took a very bad line. It doesn't have to be a big pot to demonstrate poor poker playing. If you guys think his preflop and river lines are good, fine with me. Maybe I'm the one who's the fish. Come find me at the tables. Edit: That's the great thing about these 'regulars' threads. If you think people suck, you can always find them and play against them. I actively look for TalentedTom. He's on my fish list. If he's better than I am, then he'll be very happy that a fish is always looking to sit at his tables. If he is worse than I am, then I will take his money. It's so easy to keep score - I love poker. 
|
|
#62
03-13-2007, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
vaesolis is better then most
|
|
#63
03-13-2007, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
2/4 regs People that think they are good but aren't Reefypoopoo [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] if I did think I was good, I would have moved up by now.. lol === also I'm constantly trying to improve. Don't think I've ever said, "ZOMG I'M SO GOOD BOW DOWN TO ME" 
|
|
#64
03-13-2007, 06:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
i like that i made more at 3/6 than anyone not named prep in feb and nobody mentions me =( whatever. im about to make a new account, the old one was iknowallofpi. a lot of the good players that mentioned here are players i dont mind sitting with because their ABC-ish play is better to handread against, for example Psier, DerekJC, skier, and catcher. the bitcher players to face (preposterous, vaesolis, and alofofaction, for example) are the ones I find myself way more up in terms of $$$ on, but getting the money is generally a bitch. [/ QUOTE ] Nice, I thought you were v solid and good and I remember tilting a bunch to you after a difficult Feb. I just dont understand are you really allowed to be just making new stars account names..? Isnt that a pretty big deal and its not really fair that you get to keep reads while I have no idea who you are...
|
|
#65
03-13-2007, 06:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
it isnt done for the purposes that you aligned, more that for a portion of that time on the account ive been staked (the acct isnt mine) and i want to get a new name which will be the same across all sites and branch into tournaments more.
as much as there is an advantage to not having an identity, i kinda want one for the sake of establishing myself.
|
|
#66
03-13-2007, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
as much as there is an advantage to not having an identity, i kinda want one for the sake of establishing myself. [/ QUOTE ] wow. establishing yourself with whom? the internet geeks who jerk off to this forum or the hot girls who sweat your online action?
|
|
#69
03-13-2007, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] as much as there is an advantage to not having an identity, i kinda want one for the sake of establishing myself. [/ QUOTE ] wow. establishing yourself with whom? the internet geeks who jerk off to this forum or the hot girls who sweat your online action? [/ QUOTE ] im going to play tournaments more in the next few months, its just a personal goal to be recognized as one of the better players, hopefully in a goal to get staked in big live events. anyways this thread is getting derailed.
|
|
#70
03-13-2007, 06:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread
meh. 5-10 players from memory-
good2cu seems pretty solid cts obv kerpowski when he's "experimenting" around 5-10 stfu donny (lol just kidding...guy's nittier than i am!) psier seemed ok from the small sample i have with him jeetorious...when he decides he's not too cool to abandon online duythemaster is ok, never seems to lose much fsavage is up a decent amount in my DB, he's played pretty well in the 2.5k hands i've played with him i always confuse samd320 and samh133, one sucks and the other seems ok except that he spewtards it hardcore sometimes lyric...only time ive played with him recently he seemed like he was on mega-tilt..usually pretty solid though ktrieu, i hear he only wins at 25-50 [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] straate- kinda annoying at my tables unsyatisfied...man we have a lot of history. not much recently. but he seems good when he's not pull the occasional retarded move d$ondaflop- umm, he can play well at times..i guess wiltontilt- tilts too much. nh with ur 89o>my AA aipf the other night [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] born2dog, seems decent most of the time. can spew a little imo djalminha- seems decent, maybe a little too tight leslie is fairly solid iknowpi, i'll mention you bc u want to be mentioned. u get a little creative sometimes..but ur ok now the donk list (this post is getting long, huh?)- tomthebomb!! although he hasn't been around lately pinocchio- if u adjust to his gay style he's rather easy to beat adz1234-lol minimitimo-donk. he's been short stacking lately. i love when guys who think they're great go busto riverbaby1- lol moondog- bad garompon- lol lifeisjust- sucks nicolak falviano suzanne1982 btw i started looking through my DB midway through in case it wasn't obvious. i dont have many hands on other ppl and i really need to go to sleep
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
