Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Home Poker

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2007, 11:49 AM
Strat6 Strat6 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9
Default Strange NL betting rule

I ran into this at a casino recently and I still can't seem to get a straight answer from the card room people.

1/2 NL. I am on the button. 6 players see the flop at 10 each. Board comes with a Jh 6s Jd, giving me trips ( J-10). BB bets 15, next player goes all in for 21. I more caller before I raise to 100. But the dealer makes be pull back my bet stating that I can only call since $21 bet since any all in move that equals less than half a raise, i.e., $30, freezes the action for that round meaning that I could only call teh $21 bet. I protest but he holds his ground and makes me take my bet down. The turn is a blank and gets checked to me and I make it a hundred. Get called by the flush draw. And guess what hits the river.

It took me hours to hunt down the answer and although the card room manager finally said the dealer was wrong, several of the dealers still insisted the card room manager was wrong.

Is anyone aware of a general rule where an all in bet which does not amount to a full raise caps the action for that round?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-10-2007, 12:08 PM
Bashar_assad Bashar_assad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 6
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

Hi

I´m not aware of this ruling.

If BB bets 15, you call 15 and player X raises all-in for less than 30 and furthermore there are no more active players, than the BB and you can not re-raise because player X did not complete the bet to 30 and thus his raise is not live.

But ---- you had not yet called the 15 , right ?
Then yes, in every single NL game ( that I know of) you should be able to re-raise as much as you want.

Bashar

EDIT -- I think this thread belongs in the B&M forum.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-10-2007, 12:11 PM
Strat6 Strat6 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 9
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

Exactly. I had not yet called the bet.

EDIT -- this does belong in the B&M forum. My mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-10-2007, 03:06 PM
D0p3Ad1c7 D0p3Ad1c7 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

If hes calling 100 on the turn with FD... He's calling it on the flop... Either way same result [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-10-2007, 03:40 PM
TheChad TheChad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: second nizzuts
Posts: 926
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

yes, the dealer was wrong here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-10-2007, 06:26 PM
Rottersod Rottersod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where I Want To Be
Posts: 3,154
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

The dealer is an idiot and he should be reprimanded. If the Floor and management had any guts he would have been. The rule he was enforcing doesn't take effect until everyone has made some kind of action first - in your case you hadn't.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-10-2007, 07:14 PM
psandman psandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 2,346
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

The dealer is wrong. All-in bets never close action (unbless they happen to be a cap in a limit game) . The only question is whether an all-in bet reopens action to thjose who have already acted.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-11-2007, 05:56 PM
frommagio frommagio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 976
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

[ QUOTE ]
I protest but he holds his ground and makes me take my bet down.

[/ QUOTE ]
At this point, you should stop the action and call the floor.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2007, 06:59 AM
IHeartEmoKids IHeartEmoKids is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 10
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

[ QUOTE ]
If hes calling 100 on the turn with FD... He's calling it on the flop... Either way same result [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Except he picked up the FD on the turn. The flop was rainbow.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-12-2007, 11:46 AM
Lottery Larry Lottery Larry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Home Poker in da HOOWWSSS!
Posts: 6,198
Default Re: Strange NL betting rule

If short-stack had called someone's bigger raise, would it have cut off raising by anyone behind him?

Stupid, STUPID ruling by someone who didn't think about what they were doing.

KITN for several dealers and multiple KITN for whomever trained them...

It wouldn't have changed anything in the hand, since you let them make you take it back. Call the floor right away and hold up action until it gets resolved.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.