|
|
#11
11-13-2007, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL200 - Overs + OESD in Blind Battle IP
i think its a fold here. he can be pretty strong here, although ive found many people who lead online are weak. if you hit your J or Q what are you going to do if he bets 80? shoves? i dont think he has enough money to justify a call here, i definitely dont shove.
|
|
#12
11-13-2007, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 - Overs + OESD in Blind Battle IP
i fold turn because i don't think we always get his stacks when we hit/not enough FE for a shove
i always fold pf too :s i guess calling is standard as nobody comments on OP ... what good can come from playing QJo OOP?
|
|
#14
11-13-2007, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 - Overs + OESD in Blind Battle IP
[ QUOTE ]
i fold turn because i don't think we always get his stacks when we hit/not enough FE for a shove i always fold pf too :s i guess calling is standard as nobody comments on OP ... what good can come from playing QJo OOP? [/ QUOTE ] we're in position and it's BvB and we're getting 2-1 to call. calling is standard.
|
|
#16
11-13-2007, 04:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 - Overs + OESD in Blind Battle IP
[ QUOTE ]
i fold turn because i don't think we always get his stacks when we hit/not enough FE for a shove i always fold pf too :s i guess calling is standard as nobody comments on OP ... what good can come from playing QJo OOP? [/ QUOTE ] Actually, I raise this about 90% of the time here. We're in position in a blind battle. I'd not seen him raise here before, however, and as he was pretty passive / bad, I wanted to see a flop in position and not blow myself off QJo in position pf.
|
|
#18
11-13-2007, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 - Overs + OESD in Blind Battle IP
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i fold turn because i don't think we always get his stacks when we hit/not enough FE for a shove i always fold pf too :s i guess calling is standard as nobody comments on OP ... what good can come from playing QJo OOP? [/ QUOTE ] Actually, I raise this about 90% of the time here. We're in position in a blind battle. I'd not seen him raise here before, however, and as he was pretty passive / bad, I wanted to see a flop in position and not blow myself off QJo in position pf. [/ QUOTE ] To clarify - I raise 90% of the time PF here, not on the turn.
|
|
#19
11-13-2007, 06:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 - Overs + OESD in Blind Battle IP
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] easy call [/ QUOTE ] Why? What about the times he'll hit his jack or queen and lose another bet on the river? [/ QUOTE ] So you are advocating he fold to protect himself from his own stupidity? Do you often open-fold the big blind in limped pots because you don't want to catch a pair and lose a lot of money?
|
|
#20
11-13-2007, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL200 - Overs + OESD in Blind Battle IP
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] easy call [/ QUOTE ] Why? What about the times he'll hit his jack or queen and lose another bet on the river? [/ QUOTE ] So you are advocating he fold to protect himself from his own stupidity? Do you often open-fold the big blind in limped pots because you don't want to catch a pair and lose a lot of money? [/ QUOTE ]exactly. Im not putting any money in if I hit a Q or a J...but I will stack him if I hit my K or 8.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
