|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand from 10k post
why isn't AT a possible holding for villain? or a 4? if he had A high the whole way you think he checks behind on the river?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand from 10k post
[ QUOTE ]
why isn't AT a possible holding for villain? or a 4? if he had A high the whole way you think he checks behind on the river? [/ QUOTE ] those hands are possible and he obv vbets Ax on the river. i'm not saying i'm going to win the hand 100%. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand from 10k post
[ QUOTE ]
he also should not be too worried that i have an A because i'd often bet the river with it [/ QUOTE ] not sure how the above statement could logically lead you to the conclusion below [ QUOTE ] so it's going to make him bluff some more marginal spots and check behind some winners [/ QUOTE ] if you rarely have an ace there he can vb even thinner |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand from 10k post
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] he also should not be too worried that i have an A because i'd often bet the river with it [/ QUOTE ] not sure how the above statement could logically lead you to the conclusion below [ QUOTE ] so it's going to make him bluff some more marginal spots and check behind some winners [/ QUOTE ] if you rarely have an ace there he can vb even thinner [/ QUOTE ] not if i'm turning more decent hands into bluff-catchers. Tx for example. i think it makes him check a lot more so-so hands and it polarizes his range. |
|
|