Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2007, 08:58 PM
Mossberg Mossberg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,824
Default 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

villain is 58/20/3.5~ (60 hands) and I just recently sat. I asked a couple 2p2ers and got very different opinions on my turn line.

Blinds: $3/$6
5 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $594.00
CO: $2.299.85
Button: $707.00
SB: $559.65
Hero: $925.95

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to $21</font>, Button folds, SB calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $96</font>, CO folds, SB calls.

Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($213, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

Turn: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($213, 2 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $120</font>, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises all-in $457.65</font>, Hero_______? ($337 to call)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2007, 09:04 PM
tuckercat tuckercat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 428
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

not sure why you are betting this turn...as played, you're 100% beat. fold.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2007, 09:38 PM
jk3a jk3a is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The 816, Holla
Posts: 3,531
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

i check the turn
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2007, 09:48 PM
The Velour Fog The Velour Fog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: defeating pacifists
Posts: 1,982
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

horrible turn bet if you dont have a plan for this scenario imo. i could see myself doing this against certain aggro donks but then im generally snap calling. without a better read on villain just check behind
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2007, 09:53 PM
GLmaestro GLmaestro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 538
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

i prob just b/c flop vs this guy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:04 PM
ArturiusX ArturiusX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,762
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

I call, but if I thought there's no way I bet/fold this turn.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:10 PM
intel intel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 161
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

bet call turn, i like the play,
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:11 PM
obiedman obiedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: \"If it shows their cards why did you keep betting?\"
Posts: 1,835
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

if i'm betting the turn it's always to call a shove
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:12 PM
mustmuck mustmuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 457
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

Bet/folding the turn is really ugly, so only bet if you're going to snap call the shove. So call.

Even your stats have him as pretty aggressive, so why DID you bet the turn if you don't know what you want to do here? I'm only asking in this way because your post asks whether to call or not, not about the original bet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:19 PM
MrHoobris MrHoobris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 170
Default Re: 600NL - I get myself into trouble with 2nd pair + nfd vs a donkey.

I like checking the turn. There are several good reasons to do so:

1. We are not missing out on value because we can VB the river if he checks again which he will often call lighter (I would not be betting river UI here).
2. Checking behind could induce a bluff on the river.
3. Checking behind on the turn will keep him in the pot with a low club he would otherwise fold which then may pay off a river bet.
4. We do not fear free cards.
5. We avoid getting check/raised.

The main reasons for betting are:

1. We can then shove the river if we hit a club. But in this situation I doubt we are getting paid off much because he would have to peel exactly JcJx/TcTx/QcJx/QxJc, and then still pay off a shove. And some times he will lead out the river and call a raise all-in anyway.
2. Induce a bluff ch/r, we can be happy to snap call. Based on you posting this, this doesn't seem to be the case.

So, IMO checking clearly dominates.

As played, I call. You have about 20% equity vs. the has you crushed range, and about 90% equity if he's bluffing.

You need 337/(790+337)=30% equity to call given the pot odds, so he must be bluffing at least X*90%=10%, X=11% of the time. Given his stats and your line, I'd call his shove as he'll probably be bluffing or doing something stupid at least this much.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.