2nd nuts 4 flush board - can i pay this off?

[DalconOpeaN]

certainly a fold to me, he´s not capable of making a bluff here since the ace of spades is so much in ur range

[Joeboy]

u should have been alot more aggressive in this hand imo...if u bet the flop and turn and he calls then u can definately put him on aces with the ace of spades if u took a different line u could have made an easier decision

[MixMastaPJ]

[ QUOTE ]
u should have been alot more aggressive in this hand imo...if u bet the flop and turn and he calls then u can definately put him on aces with the ace of spades if u took a different line u could have made an easier decision

[/ QUOTE ]

Or he could play it as played, spend less money, and come to the same conclusion.

EDIT: minus the Aces, are you serious?

[Donkey-Milker]

bet 750 on the turn imo

[raptor517]

[ QUOTE ]
id fold pretty quick.

[/ QUOTE ]

end of thread.. wtf

[lapoker17]

yah i folded, but he showed me some retardo (genius?) bluff.

[Ship Ship McGipp]

[ QUOTE ]
yah i folded, but he showed me some retardo (genius?) bluff.

[/ QUOTE ]

i kind of like his bluff, to be honest, kind of a lot actually.

i woudl bet 750 or 800 on the river also, i think there is some difference between that and 660.

[neon]

[ QUOTE ]

i woudl bet 750 or 800 on the river also, i think there is some difference between that and 660.

[/ QUOTE ]

I actually agree with this; I think you're inducing with your river bet size, Rob. Not saying I would call necessarily (not saying I wouldn't, either), but I definitely think that your bet sizing changes the dynamic on the river a non-insignificant amount. Bet 800 and you won't have to think twice about folding.

[LerkEr]

nothing but a call.

[recallme]

Some said here, that the As is a big part of our range,. Fact is we know that, but does he know this, too? I mean if we fold 2nd nuts here, he is right to shove in this flop!