Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)

[Stephen H]

[ QUOTE ]
Before we lynch xorbie based on the amp kill, do we have any reason to believe that the books peek was corrupted?

[/ QUOTE ]

If amp's books peek was corrupted they likely kill him ASAP after that - either he gets believed as real and books is safe or he's discredited and fnord's not clear. I'd have to look closely at the night deaths and peek orders to see if that's completely consistent considering we may have had 4 seers up and running in bluff/kyro/amp/bram, but seeing as they killed fmxda the night we lynched bram rather than one of those...hm. I dunno. At any rate, if they DON'T kill amp after manipulating one of his peeks, they almost have to keep manipulating his peeks until they do kill him. So either amp's not a real seer, or his peeks were being tweaked for several days.
I'm not ready to trust Amp's peeks, but I don't think we need to in order to find wolves.

[HerbieGRD]

My main issue with anyone who is saying we can't read anything into the Amp kill is that Amp was so likely to get lynched. The wolves killed Amp for a reason last night.

[kbar13]

[ QUOTE ]
I just can't fathom a villager either forgetting they can't peek a dead guy, or if they were randed a dead guy, failing to mention it was randed in two straight posts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because it didn't occur to me, thats who I peeked. What does it matter if it was randed or not?

[Stephen H]

[ QUOTE ]
My main issue with anyone who is saying we can't read anything into the Amp kill is that Amp was so likely to get lynched. The wolves killed Amp for a reason last night.

[/ QUOTE ]

i have no idea what would make anyone think amp was getting lynched. I certainly wasn't going to lynch amp anytime soon.

I think it's quite possible amp was the last useful seer, and if he was he's had his peeks messed with for several nights running and therefore I'm not trusting any of those peeks. I want to lynch 2-3 other wolf candidates before I'm down to deciding on Xorbie and how they turn up and what xorbie does between now and then will play a part in whether i want to lynch him or not. I'm not lynching anyone blindly on a seer peek.

On the other hand, I've thought kbar was a wolf for about a week so I'm quite happy voting him ASAP.

[Zurvan]

[ QUOTE ]
My main issue with anyone who is saying we can't read anything into the Amp kill is that Amp was so likely to get lynched. The wolves killed Amp for a reason last night.

[/ QUOTE ]

1. He might have been
2. They don't think we have any useful seers left, so they did it so we'd lynch xorbie?

[HerbieGRD]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
My main issue with anyone who is saying we can't read anything into the Amp kill is that Amp was so likely to get lynched. The wolves killed Amp for a reason last night.

[/ QUOTE ]

1. He might have been
2. They don't think we have any useful seers left, so they did it so we'd lynch xorbie?

[/ QUOTE ]
That's actually what I am coming around to believe as well.

[antidan444]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I just can't fathom a villager either forgetting they can't peek a dead guy, or if they were randed a dead guy, failing to mention it was randed in two straight posts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because it didn't occur to me, thats who I peeked. What does it matter if it was randed or not?

[/ QUOTE ]

If it wasn't randed, you can't peek a dead guy.

[kbar13]

I'm re-reading today, and don't know if i've missed something. But has traz listed his peeks from last night?

[antidan444]

No, he said he wasn't even bothering sending them in because he's been proven useless at this point.

[HerbieGRD]

Ok, I may be thinking too deeply about last nights kill

Jeremy for now