Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

[Bill Haywood]

Ooh wait, Nielso. Here's a couple quotes from the ex-NIST guy you forgot:

[ QUOTE ]
Although Dr. Quintiere was strongly critical of NIST’s conclusions and its investigatory process, he made it clear he was not a supporter of theories that the Twin Towers were brought down by pre-planted explosives.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Dr. Quintiere then presented his and his students’ research that contradicts the NIST report and points to a different cause for the collapses; the application of insufficient fire-proofing insulation on the truss rods in the Twin Towers. “I suggest that there’s an equally justifiable theory and that’s the trusses fail as they are heated by the fire with the insulation intact.

[/ QUOTE ]

[FractalTheorem]

The twin towers could not have been brought down by pre-planted explosives. Look at the video. Where in the building was the start of the structural failure? Indeed, it started on the floors that were hit by the planes! Go figure!

Had pre-planted explosives been placed in these locations, then the pilots of the planes would have had to hit those exact locations on each tower, a very difficult task.

The fact of the matter is that sufficient damage occurred to the support beams of the buildings by the impact of the planes that even a lower temperature fire could sufficiently weaken the steel enough to finish it off, as the steel beams were required to support far more than their standard load.

Any other conclusion is ludicrous.

[Bill Haywood]

[/ QUOTE ]Had pre-planted explosives been placed in these locations, then the pilots of the planes would have had to hit those exact locations on each tower, a very difficult task.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, they could have specified that the the explosions begin on the floors where the planes hit. Weren't there some reports of curtains being open on nearby buildings, like somebody was watching?

One plane made a severe, last second course correction. Why then?? He obviously had to hit precise floors.

So it was failsafe, they hit the correct floors, and the guys with the detonators could vary the order of explosions.

[FractalTheorem]

Specified that the explosions begin on the floors where the planes hit? Huh? Are you saying that the explosives were all though the building, and that they could choose whatever floor they wanted to blow? Ridiculous, and that would be terrible planning. The impact would sever the electrical connections.

The last second course correction was either due to being off course or flinching at the last second, a natural reaction.

The floors were different in each building. Your argument makes no sense at all.

[Bill Haywood]

[ QUOTE ]
The impact would sever the electrical connections.

[/ QUOTE ]

Naw, I heard they can hook radio receivers up to dynamite now.

Dude, I'm kidding.

[FractalTheorem]

Lol, good point.

However, wouldn't the impact and fire set off the explosives?

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
The twin towers could not have been brought down by pre-planted explosives. Look at the video. Where in the building was the start of the structural failure? Indeed, it started on the floors that were hit by the planes! Go figure!

Had pre-planted explosives been placed in these locations, then the pilots of the planes would have had to hit those exact locations on each tower, a very difficult task.

[/ QUOTE ]


1. Remote controlled airplanes can fly very accurate.

2. Electronically charged and remote controlled charges are easily configurable. You can do this in 5 minutes let alone an hour.

[Bill Haywood]

[ QUOTE ]
However, wouldn't the impact and fire set off the explosives?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmmm, I think Occam's razor would suggest the whole building was not wired. The explosives were in an "out of service" elevator, which could then be moved to whichever floor was directly below the flames.

This solves so many problems, like the massive wiring job required, the difficulty of the planes hitting their mark, the crash setting off premature explosions. I think all those advantages alone point very strongly to the Otis theory. Even the conspiracy "critics" admit that the buildings collapsed by pancaking.

Probably a UPS guy visiting both towers can testify to elevators out of service. Their job performance depends on efficient delivery, so they would have noticed. I'll call the 800 number right now, and if they are uncooperative about researching this, then we'll know.

Hmm, I think the Otis theory may have legs, but, YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST.

[Bill Haywood]

[ QUOTE ]
1. Remote controlled airplanes can fly very accurate.

2. Electronically charged and remote controlled charges are easily configurable. You can do this in 5 minutes let alone an hour.

[/ QUOTE ]

Could you provide us with a sequential explanation? Who installed the robo pilots, and who was flying them? Were the guys who broke into the cockpit also robots? And can you provide the sequential events of the remote charges being set? Which janitor let them into the crawl spaces, stuff like that.

[hexag1]

what makes them think that this glowing stuff is liquid flowing at all? couldnt it just be a big crack in the building, with a fire behind it?