|
|
|
|
#1
11-08-2007, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 PLO HU - Second set vs. insta-pot on river
[ QUOTE ]
what's the rule? for total crap opponents, a large river insta-bet is always the nuts, but for mediocre opponents it's always a bluff [/ QUOTE ] I think it's the other way around. Moron instapot = bluff... average "thinking" player instapot = nuts 
|
|
#2
11-08-2007, 02:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2/4 PLO HU - Second set vs. insta-pot on river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what's the rule? for total crap opponents, a large river insta-bet is always the nuts, but for mediocre opponents it's always a bluff [/ QUOTE ] I think it's the other way around. Moron instapot = bluff... average "thinking" player instapot = nuts [/ QUOTE ] i was never very good with tells.
|
|
#3
11-08-2007, 06:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2/4 PLO HU - Second set vs. insta-pot on river
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what's the rule? for total crap opponents, a large river insta-bet is always the nuts, but for mediocre opponents it's always a bluff [/ QUOTE ] I think it's the other way around. Moron instapot = bluff... average "thinking" player instapot = nuts [/ QUOTE ] I disagree, I don't think that a thinking player instapots this with anything. If I'm bluffing, it wouldn't be insta and it wouldn't be for pot, If I was leading a 35 (which I wouldnt even do in villians shoes...C/R FTW) I still wouldn't bet pot and it definately wouldnt be a quick bet.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
