luckyjimm banned

durron597 · #1 07-06-2007, 04:13 PM

wow i feel like im stepping my foot in a lot of other mods business these days ROFL... i think this is #5 in like a week

why is luckyjimm banned? his post was clearly a joke??

iron81 · #2 07-06-2007, 04:15 PM

You saw the ATF thread right? Gild reduced the ban as a result. Mike added to it because he circumvented the ban to complain in ATF. Final ban length: it expires around midnight EST today.

ahnuld · #3 07-06-2007, 04:48 PM

wow, really stupid bad

Gildwulf · #4 07-06-2007, 05:08 PM

the issue was resolved as far as I'm concerned

Dids · #5 07-06-2007, 05:19 PM

Nobody could have done NVG a favor and accidentially forgot to set a ban length huh?

lj never does anything ban worthy, but he does a lot of sucking.

Mike Haven · #6 07-06-2007, 05:20 PM

[ QUOTE ]
You saw the ATF thread right? Gild reduced the ban as a result. Mike added to it because he circumvented the ban to complain in ATF. Final ban length: it expires around midnight EST today.

[/ QUOTE ]

This doesn't quite read as events happened.

luckyjimm complained about a two days ban, (although it was actually three days), by posting in ATF with his Jim_Dixon account.

Because of an old post by Ryan, I added 2.5 days to the ban, which had 2.5 days remaining when I looked at it.

Standard. I wasn't concerned with the rights or wrongs of the original ban.

GW must have decided his ban was too harsh in the first place, so he reduced the total ban to 0.5 days from the time of his amendment.

El Diablo · #7 07-06-2007, 05:23 PM

Dibs,

lj imo provides a real resource to the forums by railing the high stakes games seemingly 24/7.

Dids · #8 07-06-2007, 08:14 PM

El D,

If cts managed to go bust as suggested in recent thread without anybody noticing, I will have to agree. Prior to that it was my assumption that jim wasn't the only one.

durron597 · #9 07-06-2007, 08:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]

GW must have decided his ban was too harsh in the first place, so he reduced the total ban to 0.5 days from the time of his amendment.

[/ QUOTE ]

this wouldn't have happened if he didn't complain

what was he supposed to do, banning someone for making a legit complaint about their original ban is ridiculous

iron81 · #10 07-06-2007, 08:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
what was he supposed to do, banning someone for making a legit complaint about their original ban is ridiculous

[/ QUOTE ]
In that link Mike posted, Ryan states the recourse for a ban is to e-mail the forummaster or use a gimmick to PM a mod or admin. I agree with Durron, but them's the rules: no posting while banned, period.