|
|
#31
11-13-2007, 10:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 NL winrates?
[ QUOTE ]
3/6 limit is a card catching contest. You have to catch cards & hope your hand outruns the other 9 idiots chasing you all the way to the river. There's no strategy... [/ QUOTE ] Oh brother. 
|
|
#32
11-13-2007, 10:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1/2 NL winrates?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] All things being equal, would one make more at 3/6 limit or 1/2NL? [/ QUOTE ] 1/2 NL and its not even close... moreso with those juicy 500 and 1000 buyin games, that is pretty awesome to have those at your disposal... The more I think about it, the average stack is the question I should have also asked. I think a winrate equal to 8-10% of the average stack per hour is attainable by anyone who isnt an idiot monkey, dont even need to be the best at the table [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. 3/6 limit is a card catching contest. You have to catch cards & hope your hand outruns the other 9 idiots chasing you all the way to the river. There's no strategy or hand reading. It's no foldem holdem. [/ QUOTE ] You say this like its a bad thing... [/ QUOTE ] Well it's not if you can stand the variance & not go on tilt.
|
|
#33
11-13-2007, 10:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1/2 NL winrates?
[ QUOTE ]
If you tip $5-10 every hand you will probably lose in the long but don’t stiff our hard working dealers. [/ QUOTE ] What the freak are you freaking talking about? You don't tip $5-10 if you want to make money. You tip $1, maybe an extra buck or 2 here and there for something special. Anyone who's playing seriously and is tipping $5-10 is insane. The only players who do that are whales trying to impress someone or drunk tourists who are feeling generous because the tip looks small compared to the pot.
|
|
#34
11-13-2007, 10:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1/2 NL winrates?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 3/6 limit is a card catching contest. You have to catch cards & hope your hand outruns the other 9 idiots chasing you all the way to the river. There's no strategy or hand reading. It's no foldem holdem. [/ QUOTE ] You say this like its a bad thing... [/ QUOTE ] dont you think this can be a bad thing. if you cant get anyone off a hand then it is a card catching contest. welcome to playing 9/4 ubernit style. i feel this way alot when im playing 1-2. [/ QUOTE ] No, it's a really really good thing. If all the 30/60 players played this way I'd be rich just going to Vegas once a month. It's a "card catching contest" in the sense that you have to show down good hands, but that is not at all the same thing as saying there's no skill or strategy. A good player who understands poker theory will crush that game, and a bad player will lose all his chipses. That is not what most people think of as a card catching game where luck rules and you can't beat the rake long term. Geez, some of you guys crack me up.
|
|
#37
11-13-2007, 11:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1/2 NL winrates?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] All things being equal, would one make more at 3/6 limit or 1/2NL? [/ QUOTE ] 1/2NL by far. [/ QUOTE ] I agree, 1/2, but if your a beginner, and a bit gun shy of losing your roll, 3/6limit is a very safe choice. Limit and No limit require different skill sets though, a topic which you can find ample threads about.
|
|
#39
11-13-2007, 03:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1/2 NL winrates?
[ QUOTE ]
1/2NL is more like 5/10Limit. Actually, i used to play in a 5/10 limit game where 7-9 people saw the flop in a reraised pot, never saw that in a 1-2NLgame. [/ QUOTE ] You would if the raises were equivalent - raising to $4 and then to $6.
|
|
#40
11-13-2007, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1/2 NL winrates?
over my 20(about 180hrs) sessions at 300max ($12/hour time charge) in biloxi I'm at about $20/hr. I've only had one losing session and my guess is I'm running decent. I would guess $10-15 or so is sustainable. the play is exceptionally bad, so maybe more is sustainable.
too bad it costs me about $40 in gas and 2.5 hour round trip or I'd play much more.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
