Best site for 100NL-400NL. Stars, UB, or Full Tilt?

cs3 · #1 10-17-2006, 04:53 PM

Im a SSNLer making the move from party like most otheres.
wich site do you gusy hhtink is most profitiable?

is the following correct?
UB and full tilt both offer rackeback between 27-30% and offer a nice deposit bonus.
Stars has no rakeback and no to little bonus, but many say the games and software are best.

So which is the best to depsoit on?

Reef · #2 10-17-2006, 05:06 PM

haven't played on other sites, but stars is a nitfest

dtan05 · #3 10-17-2006, 05:15 PM

lol at FT, at LEAST 5 of the 6maxers are regulars at 5/10. usually there's six.

cs3 · #4 10-17-2006, 05:44 PM

anyone a regular at the UB small games... 100NL or 200NL? it seems like the best combination of rakeback (30%) + bonus (600$ = 6 buyins) but i havent heard much about the games other than there arent many.

is rakeback even that big of an issue if I average at most 10K-15K hands per month?
which sites offer resizeable tables?
can I play at least 4 tables on every site?

4thstreetpete · #5 10-17-2006, 06:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
is rakeback even that big of an issue if I average at most 10K-15K hands per month?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes

[ QUOTE ]
which sites offer resizeable tables?

[/ QUOTE ]

Pokerstars and Partypoker

[ QUOTE ]

can I play at least 4 tables on every site?

[/ QUOTE ]

Almost

Andykay · #6 10-17-2006, 06:53 PM

I just moved to UB from party about a week ago. I've generated roughly 1k in rake playing about 8000 hands so far, so that's $300 or so in rakeback i'll get.

There's roughly 4-10 200NL games going at any one time. I 4 table usually, and sometimes it can be tough to find 4 full games, but i'm Australian and play off peak hours for americans. There's still usually 4 tables when i'm around, which is enough to satisfy me.

-Andrew

Bullet_Dodger · #7 10-17-2006, 07:14 PM

how many people are on UB usually? are there more on FT or UB.

LVcardjunkie · #8 10-17-2006, 07:22 PM

[ QUOTE ]
anyone a regular at the UB small games... 100NL or 200NL? it seems like the best combination of rakeback (30%) + bonus (600$ = 6 buyins) but i havent heard much about the games other than there arent many.

is rakeback even that big of an issue if I average at most 10K-15K hands per month?
which sites offer resizeable tables?
can I play at least 4 tables on every site?

[/ QUOTE ]

I moved to 100NL at UB; played ~12K hands so far.
There are many more regulars to watch for, but still plenty of fish. However, most are super-aggressive. Takes some getting used to but still plenty profitable. The bonuses and rakeback combined with the speed of the software make it pretty juicy.

cs3 · #9 10-17-2006, 07:36 PM

thanks for the replies so far. any comments about Full Tilt SSNL games?

Dunkman · #10 10-17-2006, 07:40 PM

[ QUOTE ]
thanks for the replies so far. any comments about Full Tilt SSNL games?

[/ QUOTE ]

They're probably the toughest I've played at, but they're by no means tough. At Stars I generally saw 1-2 other decent players at the table...at FT I'd say 2-3. There's still fish, but there's more multi-tablers per fish.