Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-18-2007, 10:36 AM
boss boss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 44
Default Re: KJs

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


Based on your estimates you put villain on
88 - 6 combos
33 - 6 combos
A8 sp - 1 combo
T9 s/o - 16 combos (4 suited + 12 unsuited)
KQ sp - 1 combo
AQ sp - 1 combo
QJ - 8 combos
J8 - 9 combos
J3 - 9 combos


[/ QUOTE ]

This range is absolutely ridiculous. Where is JT etc? Where is AK? I'm almost serious about that. U can't assume all villains play logically every time, especially not when the pot is big. We have TPGK on a realtively safe board. Don't fold!

[/ QUOTE ]

My list was merely a representation of what OP thought villain hand range was. I agree some hands probably should be added others should be removed. Even though I never said I agreed on all the possible hands the list served two purposes:

A/ That against villains likely range you are behind to most hands and that the call is close (please provide a better list of hands so that I can see what hands you put him on.)

B/ Given this range the river is a safe fold
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-18-2007, 10:37 AM
Dangeresque Dangeresque is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Heartattack at 1-2 Limit
Posts: 1,013
Default Re: KJs

I like all of it. KJs is def. playable UTG in a reasonable game. Ater you're raised on the turn, you're basically getting 4-1, because you intend to call down, though a c/f unimproved if you have a good read on villain as a rock who would only do this with 2-pair + would also not be a horrible decision, but that situation is rare. T9 could make this play every now and again, or even a weak Jack. You're right often enough to call down, though I don't like that over-call by MP2. If he calls 2 bets cold instead of one at a time, I'd let it go.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-18-2007, 10:42 AM
F. McSimmons F. McSimmons is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: breakfast with no hog
Posts: 563
Default Re: KJs

This looks alright to me. lol @ MP2
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-18-2007, 12:02 PM
NIX NIX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: It\'s Sabotage
Posts: 1,762
Default Re: KJs

I play it the same.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-18-2007, 01:20 PM
Sushiglutton Sushiglutton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Searching for fish
Posts: 2,048
Default Re: KJs

[ QUOTE ]
please provide a better list of hands so that I can see what hands you put him on.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is no point in putting villain on a range. Villain is unknown so we have no idea how he is playing. On the river we are getting 11.5:1 pot-odds. The thing is that there is absolutely no chance that u can be over 90% (or something) that an unknown has a better hand than we do. Hand ranges simply isn't relevant in this spot. That's what I meant by the AK remark. Trying to make sophisticated reads agaisnt an unknown and fold big pots for one bet on the river with such a good hand that we have is very bad. This folds goes under the SSHE concep 'don't make big lay-downs in big pots'
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-18-2007, 05:12 PM
TarHeel100 TarHeel100 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tobacco Road
Posts: 380
Default Re: KJs

Looks standard to me
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.