#1
|
|||
|
|||
[censored] you omaha
i m getting really, really tired of omaha. i mean, i cant see any mistake in my play of that hand and still it was only a flip coin for me after the turn. wtf. i just grind, grind, grind and then i have a monster hand and run into a monster draw that hits just about all the time. at least i hadnt built up my stack, so i just lost 1 buy-in in that hand.
** Game ID 1198789181 starting - 2007-02-11 15:44:24 ** Dennis [Omaha] (0.10|0.20 Pot Limit - Cash Game) Real Money - JohnnyKidd sitting in seat 1 with $71.16 - ManneE sitting in seat 2 with $7.81 - kukulf sitting in seat 3 with $49.80 - svil69 sitting in seat 4 with $14.00 [Dealer] - ymb sitting in seat 5 with $147.21 - HERO sitting in seat 6 with $20.98 ymb posted the small blind - $0.10 HERO posted the big blind - $0.20 ** Dealing card to HERO : 2 of Clubs, Queen of Spades, King of Spades, King of Hearts JohnnyKidd called - $0.20 ManneE folded kukulf called - $0.20 svil69 called - $0.20 ymb called - $0.20 HERO checked ** Dealing the flop: King of Diamonds, Jack of Clubs, 7 of Hearts ymb checked HERO checked JohnnyKidd bet - $0.20 kukulf called - $0.20 svil69 raised - $1.80 ymb folded HERO called - $1.80 JohnnyKidd folded kukulf called - $1.80 ** Dealing the turn: 5 of Diamonds HERO checked kukulf checked svil69 bet - $6.60 HERO went all-in - $19.18 kukulf called - $19.18 svil69 went all-in - $5.40 ** Dealing the river: 6 of Spades HERO shows: 2 of Clubs, Queen of Spades, King of Spades, King of Hearts kukulf shows: Queen of Hearts, 10 of Spades, 3 of Diamonds, 4 of Diamonds svil69 shows: Jack of Spades, 9 of Hearts, Jack of Diamonds, 8 of Spades kukulf wins $14.36 from side pot 1 svil69 wins $42.30 from the main pot End of game 1198789181 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
This is standard, no? If you can't mentally handle the variance, PLO isn't for you.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
Raise the flop. K thx
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
Yeah, that too. If you didn't try to blow out the pot on the flop, it is a bit your fault.
Although -- the guy really wasn't going anywhere. You were set against set w/ a redraw. It happens. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
[ QUOTE ]
This is standard, no? If you can't mentally handle the variance, PLO isn't for you. [/ QUOTE ] Every time you sit down at a table, you need to be prepared to lose your buyin. By not fearing the loss, playing correctly is less of a problem (that doesn't mean you played it correctly =) ) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
i know u need to have a high tolerance for variance when playing omaha. its just pretty frustrating when u have built up your stack to like 3 buy-ins, flop top set and run into a monster draw that hits on the river to lose it all. happened quite often to me in the last days, so i m losing money actually. maybe i ran too hot in the beginning (more than 50 ptbb/100 in the first 2k hands [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]) so i have to pay for that now.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
This type of bad beat post and all the stuff about auto-pushing or calling with mediocre aces really belongs in the Low Content Thread each month.
Thanks, -T |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Troll for mod. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Troll for mod. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Second |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [censored] you omaha
One does not has to play PLO when there's nl holdem, and it's far more popular, and most will find good games from somewhere. PLO generally means bigger pots but also smaller edges (meaning huge fluctuations, long run being far away), or at full ring games the edges may not even be there, but shorthanded where the general feel is much like at limit holdem the edges are there, and it's the only type of PLO that I would recommend.
|
|
|