facebook rolls out Plan B

[ianisakson]

this is scary, but there is nothing I can do because most of my friends have tons of pictures of me on there. I might as well start posting my noodz on there.

[kylephilly]

Gildwulf,

Where do you want to go out to dinner tonight? How about [ad]the Blue Oyster, where guys over 21 eat and drink for half price and every Wednesday is free leather vest night![/ad] or we could just go to the usual spot.

I love you darling.

XOXOXO
Gildwulf's tang

[Gildwulf]

[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone actually send messages through facebook anyway?

If I do, it's to tell some random broad she's hot cuz I'm crunked.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you post on people's walls? 99.99999% of people on facebook do

[AE6]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone actually send messages through facebook anyway?

If I do, it's to tell some random broad she's hot cuz I'm crunked.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you post on people's walls? 99.99999% of people on facebook do

[/ QUOTE ]
uhhhh pretty positive they're not integrating advertisements into wall posts

[AquaSwing]

So this is what I should expect?

"i cant wait to see u this weekend. i luv those red panties u bought 4 me. BE SURE TO USE TROJAN BRANED CONDOMS. omg ur gonna get so laid!!!@"

Sweet. I'll make sure all of my pictures have some bare ass in them. BTW, where are the royalities from them making money off your image?

[THEOSU]

gild,

does this mean that facebook now has the rights to the entire nlsoldier/fluffpop dramabomb?

[ahnuld]

[ QUOTE ]
gild,

does this mean that facebook now has the rights to the entire nlsoldier/fluffpop dramabomb?

[/ QUOTE ]

what dramabomb?

[bustowithnobra]

Uhh, well, this is serious biz. The majority of facebooks members probably didn't know their pictures were going to be used by facebook in this manner, and unless facebooks terms of service, clearly, convincingly and most of all BOLDY stated these terms, I think there is a strong argument to fight it. Reason being, that for most contracts to be valid, both parties must know what they are agreeing to, and in a case like facebook, it can be easily proven that most people did not belive they were signing up for that. Because of fraud, and the era of standardization where a consumer expects to be signing a certain contract with certain terms, this is no longer and era of, you signed it you agreed to it.

I think this is a great opportunity- if facebook decides to pursue its plans- for another website to surface like facebook that previously did not have an opportunity.

[felix83]

[ QUOTE ]
Uhh, well, this is serious biz. The majority of facebooks members probably didn't know their pictures were going to be used by facebook in this manner, and unless facebooks terms of service, clearly, convincingly and most of all BOLDY stated these terms, I think there is a strong argument to fight it. Reason being, that for most contracts to be valid, both parties must know what they are agreeing to, and in a case like facebook, it can be easily proven that most people did not belive they were signing up for that. Because of fraud, and the era of standardization where a consumer expects to be signing a certain contract with certain terms, this is no longer and era of, you signed it you agreed to it.

I think this is a great opportunity- if facebook decides to pursue its plans- for another website to surface like facebook that previously did not have an opportunity.

[/ QUOTE ]



Thank god 2p2 is on the case. ZOMG LAWZ

[PITTM]

update.