#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
If that's the case, when do you c-bet, if ever? If your requisites for c-betting after a PF raise were that you needed a hand that you can hold to a raise from a worse hand, you would almost never cbet.
I stated it slightly incorrectly above, but the turn is going to bring 40 out of 47 cards (forgot non-club 2's originally) that can potentially help villain. Checking this flop means you are giving up on the hand a huge majority of the time, which is missing value and terribly exploitable. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
adding to the flop play discusion whats our plan if
we c-bet flop and he calls and checks turn to us the turn is a red 7? the turn is a 7 of clubs? the turn is Queen of clubs? the turn is a red Queen? If we check thru are we ever calling any river bets? If we check flop and get led into on turn for 24$ whats out line with: the turn is a red 7? the turn is a 7 of clubs? the turn is Queen of clubs? the turn is a red Queen? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
[ QUOTE ]
If that's the case, when do you c-bet, if ever? If your requisites for c-betting after a PF raise were that you needed a hand that you can hold to a raise from a worse hand, you would almost never cbet. I stated it slightly incorrectly above, but the turn is going to bring 40 out of 47 cards (forgot non-club 2's originally) that can potentially help villain. Checking this flop means you are giving up on the hand a huge majority of the time, which is missing value and terribly exploitable. [/ QUOTE ] I cbet for tons of reasons usually some combination of these: -To fold out better hands (very rarely accomplished here) -For value (not accomplished here) -For free cards -For pressure (lots of a nice cards that are good double and triple barrels) -As a semi-bluff -Sometimes for metagame -Sometimes to protect myself from a very easy bluff from villain (not very easy for him to turn ATC into a bluff on this board especially given the read) Besides when we check we are not giving up we have a lot of showdown value that we lose if we bet. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
Well, we can stop the debate because we disagree fundamentally:
[ QUOTE ] I cbet for tons of reasons usually some combination of these: [/ QUOTE ] -To fold out better hands (very rarely accomplished here)Agreed -For value (not accomplished here)Disagree... there is tons of value here since you are ahead here way more than half the time, and given the size of the c-bet, you only have to be ahead ~40% for this to be profitable. Obviously it's always profitable when villain folds -For free cardsWe can do this here, although I wouldn't recommend it. I'd fire again on a lot of turns -For pressure (double and triple barrels)Agreed, you can easily turn your hand into a bluff and maintain consistency in your line. You can fold a lot of mid-pairs and weaker jacks with a bet on the turn -As a semi-bluff (very similar to free cards)We have that here in some capacity, although I still call it a v-bet -Sometimes for metagameI can't comment here without playing in this match personally -Sometimes to protect myself from a very easy bluff from villain (not very easy for him to turn ATC into a bluff on this board especially given the read)You also have the same luxury, but you have position. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
I would cbet the flop here for the reasons stated by MasterLJ. Your line is way weird when the hand gets to the river, but I would value bet anywhere between 70-100, and fold to a push.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
Its not for value because we dont get called by worse hands. Draws are basically better hands in this spot unless they c/c c/c chk because most of the time they should push us off our hand at some point in the hand. I also dont think its a good texture flop to double barrel a lot. Furthermore just because a cbet works 40% here doesnt make it the best option. Clearly I play a very different style from you MLJ so I think we can both be partially correct in this spot but to say not c-betting here 100% is a leak is just wrong IMO.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
cwar: I will cbet this flop very often, but check behind sometimes. I don't think it's a leak to not cbet it every time, but it should definetely be cbetted more than 50% of the times.
Also: Hero's turn reraise looks a lot like an A of clubs looking for a fold, so you should not at all be surprised to get a call from a naked K or even a J here (even though that's stretching it). |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
"You absolutely have something to protect here, you have a pair HU."
"Checking this flop means you are giving up on the hand a huge majority of the time" i wonder if these two statements are related |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
[ QUOTE ]
"You absolutely have something to protect here, you have a pair HU." "Checking this flop means you are giving up on the hand a huge majority of the time" i wonder if these two statements are related [/ QUOTE ] Im not really sure I get what you are trying to say... What are your thoughts on the hand? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom two -- nl cash
if you protect every hand, a flop check is giving away a ton of info.
as for the hand in general, i was trying to think of a good bet size for the river. i think i'm getting looked up by a single king most of the time, i just wasn't sure whether to bet 100, 130-150, or push for 350. do people think a turn raise and then a push looks like a bluff (maybe A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]x with x not being a club)? |
|
|