Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Heads Up Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-14-2007, 05:45 PM
MasterLJ MasterLJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PARTY PRIME!!!!!!
Posts: 5,631
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

If that's the case, when do you c-bet, if ever? If your requisites for c-betting after a PF raise were that you needed a hand that you can hold to a raise from a worse hand, you would almost never cbet.

I stated it slightly incorrectly above, but the turn is going to bring 40 out of 47 cards (forgot non-club 2's originally) that can potentially help villain.

Checking this flop means you are giving up on the hand a huge majority of the time, which is missing value and terribly exploitable.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-14-2007, 05:56 PM
RicherThanRichie RicherThanRichie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 87
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

adding to the flop play discusion whats our plan if
we c-bet flop and he calls and checks turn to us
the turn is a red 7?
the turn is a 7 of clubs?
the turn is Queen of clubs?
the turn is a red Queen?

If we check thru are we ever calling any river bets?


If we check flop and get led into on turn for 24$ whats out line with:
the turn is a red 7?
the turn is a 7 of clubs?
the turn is Queen of clubs?
the turn is a red Queen?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:13 PM
cwar cwar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cwar LLC
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

[ QUOTE ]
If that's the case, when do you c-bet, if ever? If your requisites for c-betting after a PF raise were that you needed a hand that you can hold to a raise from a worse hand, you would almost never cbet.

I stated it slightly incorrectly above, but the turn is going to bring 40 out of 47 cards (forgot non-club 2's originally) that can potentially help villain.

Checking this flop means you are giving up on the hand a huge majority of the time, which is missing value and terribly exploitable.

[/ QUOTE ]
I cbet for tons of reasons usually some combination of these:
-To fold out better hands (very rarely accomplished here)
-For value (not accomplished here)
-For free cards
-For pressure (lots of a nice cards that are good double and triple barrels)
-As a semi-bluff
-Sometimes for metagame
-Sometimes to protect myself from a very easy bluff from villain (not very easy for him to turn ATC into a bluff on this board especially given the read)

Besides when we check we are not giving up we have a lot of showdown value that we lose if we bet.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:25 PM
MasterLJ MasterLJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PARTY PRIME!!!!!!
Posts: 5,631
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

Well, we can stop the debate because we disagree fundamentally:

[ QUOTE ]
I cbet for tons of reasons usually some combination of these:

[/ QUOTE ]
-To fold out better hands (very rarely accomplished here)Agreed
-For value (not accomplished here)Disagree... there is tons of value here since you are ahead here way more than half the time, and given the size of the c-bet, you only have to be ahead ~40% for this to be profitable. Obviously it's always profitable when villain folds
-For free cardsWe can do this here, although I wouldn't recommend it. I'd fire again on a lot of turns
-For pressure (double and triple barrels)Agreed, you can easily turn your hand into a bluff and maintain consistency in your line. You can fold a lot of mid-pairs and weaker jacks with a bet on the turn
-As a semi-bluff (very similar to free cards)We have that here in some capacity, although I still call it a v-bet
-Sometimes for metagameI can't comment here without playing in this match personally
-Sometimes to protect myself from a very easy bluff from villain (not very easy for him to turn ATC into a bluff on this board especially given the read)You also have the same luxury, but you have position.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:36 PM
ivvaen ivvaen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 145
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

I would cbet the flop here for the reasons stated by MasterLJ. Your line is way weird when the hand gets to the river, but I would value bet anywhere between 70-100, and fold to a push.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:43 PM
cwar cwar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cwar LLC
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

Its not for value because we dont get called by worse hands. Draws are basically better hands in this spot unless they c/c c/c chk because most of the time they should push us off our hand at some point in the hand. I also dont think its a good texture flop to double barrel a lot. Furthermore just because a cbet works 40% here doesnt make it the best option. Clearly I play a very different style from you MLJ so I think we can both be partially correct in this spot but to say not c-betting here 100% is a leak is just wrong IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-14-2007, 06:50 PM
ivvaen ivvaen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 145
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

cwar: I will cbet this flop very often, but check behind sometimes. I don't think it's a leak to not cbet it every time, but it should definetely be cbetted more than 50% of the times.

Also: Hero's turn reraise looks a lot like an A of clubs looking for a fold, so you should not at all be surprised to get a call from a naked K or even a J here (even though that's stretching it).
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-14-2007, 10:53 PM
whaahhahahah whaahhahahah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: not blogging
Posts: 385
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

"You absolutely have something to protect here, you have a pair HU."

"Checking this flop means you are giving up on the hand a huge majority of the time"

i wonder if these two statements are related
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-14-2007, 10:56 PM
cwar cwar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cwar LLC
Posts: 2,491
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

[ QUOTE ]
"You absolutely have something to protect here, you have a pair HU."

"Checking this flop means you are giving up on the hand a huge majority of the time"

i wonder if these two statements are related

[/ QUOTE ]
Im not really sure I get what you are trying to say... What are your thoughts on the hand?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-14-2007, 11:15 PM
whaahhahahah whaahhahahah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: not blogging
Posts: 385
Default Re: bottom two -- nl cash

if you protect every hand, a flop check is giving away a ton of info.

as for the hand in general, i was trying to think of a good bet size for the river.

i think i'm getting looked up by a single king most of the time, i just wasn't sure whether to bet 100, 130-150, or push for 350.

do people think a turn raise and then a push looks like a bluff (maybe A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]x with x not being a club)?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.