|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
Who is doing the commentary?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
Howard David and Lacey Jones
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
Go Duck!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
Nice of Howard to say the odds of getting 4 of a kind are 500-1. I could swear he also said that about a royal flush when he mentioned Ivey's odds of winning the main event another time he mentioned this.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
That sucks! One of the players didn't realize she had the straight, and the TD was scolding her because she didn't bet it before the other player (who wisely checked)! I gather that there is a new rule they have at the WSOP, that if you know you have the nuts, you MUST bet it, or you'll get a penalty! That's bogus!
I mean what happens if you try to trap someone into betting if you check it, and they don't happen to bite there. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
[ QUOTE ]
That sucks! One of the players didn't realize she had the straight, and the TD was scolding her because she didn't bet it before the other player (who wisely checked)! I gather that there is a new rule they have at the WSOP, that if you know you have the nuts, you MUST bet it, or you'll get a penalty! That's bogus! I mean what happens if you try to trap someone into betting if you check it, and they don't happen to bite there. [/ QUOTE ] I think the rule is if you are *last* to act, with the nuts, and check it... she was last to act, not first. hence the scolding. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
I've watched about 10 minutes of this, and thats way too much.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
Please, PLEASE let me in that game! I want that empty seat soo bad! That table is sooo passive!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
Why is the event free to view on the webcast as opposed to others?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Womens event #17
If you've watched 10 minutes of this, you wouldn't have wanted to pay for it either.
|
|
|