Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:19 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
Hold that point.

I think it's pretty hard to assume that anyone is folding QQ here so it really doesn't matter.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]

It is very hard to assume anyone is folding QQ here, however based on your posts here I would give you credit to fold QQ here most of the time. I would shove a much bigger range against you than against an unknown.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:22 PM
Pasterbator Pasterbator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ruining lives.
Posts: 4,795
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hold that point.

I think it's pretty hard to assume that anyone is folding QQ here so it really doesn't matter.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]

It is very hard to assume anyone is folding QQ here, however based on your posts here I would give you credit to fold QQ here most of the time. I would shove a much bigger range against you than against an unknown.

[/ QUOTE ]

That would be really bad. He definitely has a tight range here, so more often than not, he's going to have AA/KK/QQ AND NOT FOLD. I doubt he's folding QQ on a regular basis, but against this particular opponent who's range seems to be JJ+, AK, its a good fold.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:08 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
I had QQ.

I should have perhaps reraised preflop, but it's close. Once eagles pushed, I put him on KK/AA so I folded.

I'm quite surprised he pushed JJ, as I think it's an easy fold.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I had you wrong, but at least this proves my point about why I'd push QQ here. You might have stacked him. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:26 PM
Eagles Eagles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saving the season
Posts: 8,324
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
I had QQ.

I should have perhaps reraised preflop, but it's close. Once eagles pushed, I put him on KK/AA so I folded.

I'm quite surprised he pushed JJ, as I think it's an easy fold.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]
Well let me explain the reasoning behind my play once you cold call that raise I figure that you're range would be larger becauase it seemed clear to me and I assumed to you that UTG was pushing a very large range. I'm sure that you have seen short stacks in early levels consistently make pushes with bad and marginal hands then you cold called. Now I figured given you're read you are calling there with something along the lines of 99+ AQ+. However more importantly I knew it would be very difficult for you to call my shove with QQ and AK. Which made it in my mind a much better shove because you probably need KK+ to call. Now given how I played it I still think you're fold was correct because my range here at the absolute most is JJ+ which means you are behind my range. More importantly in terms of you're play you should not have reraised think about it all reraising does is let opponents play perfectly against you obviously aa and kk are calling and you are not letting you're selves get action from worse hands. Think about if another play at the table has JJ you definetely are getting action from them and could possibly bust them if an unknown shoves are you calling? This scenario is pretty much the only one where reraising is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:28 PM
ryanghall ryanghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,789
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

I'd have to be on crack to call with with AQ or 99.

Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:34 PM
Eagles Eagles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Saving the season
Posts: 8,324
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
I'd have to be on crack to call with with AQ or 99.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]
I know you're utg+1 but your crushing his range.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:49 PM
ryanghall ryanghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,789
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

Again, it's not his range that's relevant. It's the fact that 7 people are left to act behind me and I obviously can't call an allin w/ AQ, 99
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:30 PM
Melchiades Melchiades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway (London currently)
Posts: 5,040
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
think about it all reraising does is let opponents play perfectly against you

[/ QUOTE ]
People playing perfectly against you is better than people forcing you out with a worse hand though. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Just saying.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:33 PM
Pasterbator Pasterbator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: ruining lives.
Posts: 4,795
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
think about it all reraising does is let opponents play perfectly against you

[/ QUOTE ]
People playing perfectly against you is better than people forcing you out with a worse hand though. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Just saying.

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't that the same thing?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-17-2006, 04:42 PM
Melchiades Melchiades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway (London currently)
Posts: 5,040
Default Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
think about it all reraising does is let opponents play perfectly against you

[/ QUOTE ]
People playing perfectly against you is better than people forcing you out with a worse hand though. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Just saying.

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't that the same thing?

[/ QUOTE ]
I guess. I assumed by "play perfectly against you" he meant folding all weaker hands and calling/raising with stronger hands though which would have been preferable to what actually happened in this hand. Mostly I was just joking.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.