#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
Okay, I am really only expecting one answer here, but I feel the answer given will help clarify a little bit of thinking about when you have a good hand but a scary board, and you're last to act. This might be useful to newer players
The other two players are loose and can sometimes do stupid things, but aren't donkeys or by any means terrible. PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (8 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) BB ($100) UTG ($126.35) UTG+1 ($43.45) MP1 ($99.10) MP2 ($75.70) Hero ($113.25) Button ($19.35) SB ($77.80) Preflop: Hero is CO with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP1 calls $1, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls $1, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB completes, BB checks. Flop: ($4) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font> SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 bets $3</font>, Hero calls $3, SB calls $3, BB folds. Turn: ($13) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, MP1 checks, Hero checks. River: ($13) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, MP1 checks, Hero ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
I'll probably check behind as no worse hand will call anyway.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
Sevens full would have fired, sixes full would have fired, but one of the villains especially the SB could play this way with 65, 85 or 45 and he will call if we bet. Probably no straights out there, probably no overpairs out there (would have raised preflop), maybe a worse flushdraw; we are betting for value against not many hands. Bluffing on this board is also pretty terrible because we will looked up by better hands a lot (hope villains understand that). Check behind.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
I hope i don't get this wrong.
I bet the river for $9, villains will call with overpairs, trips, straights and flushs. "The other two players are loose and can sometimes do stupid things" Hopefully this doesn't include shoving 32 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] on river... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
trips? check the board again.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
[ QUOTE ]
trips? check the board again. [/ QUOTE ] oops, didnt see that river 5. Ok, this a bit closer now, but i'm still leaning towards a bet, get the feeling thats the wrong answer though. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
Check. You re lucky in fact to see a cheap showdown there. If they would ve played more aggressive I guess you might have been out by the turn already..
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
Meh, he might call with A-high. A lot of people know that it is good in this spot. I would tend to check it behind here though as you just don't get called by worse hands very often and you won't want to call a c/r.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
I check it, Every time.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100: A good hand on a scary board by the river...
bet it. somebody could have the straight draw as well, and could pay you off as well.
it's a very easy b/f anyways, so not much to lose. |
|
|