|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
I would not fold getting 2:1 given the action so far.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
I would not fold getting 2:1 given the action so far. [/ QUOTE ] what? do you think he is bluffing? this action makes me think he is super strong |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
I agree to a call here (although I don't think it's that obvious) but would like opinions on TT and 99. When do you think our equity becomes too small, which OP do you start folding here?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
I agree to a call here (although I don't think it's that obvious) but would like opinions on TT and 99. When do you think our equity becomes too small, which OP do you start folding here? [/ QUOTE ] We need about 34% equity to make the call. We get close to that with a range like this : Hand 0: 32.905% 30.53% 02.38% 51678 4027.50 { JJ } Hand 1: 67.095% 64.72% 02.38% 109557 4027.50 { TT+, AdKd, AdQd, AdJd, KdQd } But if we take out TT we are never better then 20%.So we hope here he does this with a pp smaller than JJ or some bluff ? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
AK bluffing, yeah. I'm just curious because I would fold TT here and super-insta call with QQ. Whether this is sound or not I don't know, I'd just draw the line with JJ and am wondering what the worst hand others are calling here with is and why.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
I know its not a reliable tell, but how fast did he shove? Like, I doubt he instashoves here with TT, JJ or even QQ.
Even with great odds I think this is a fold. Against JJ+ and two overs with a FD (AQhh AKhh) you are about 25/75. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
easy snap call? 66 and 55 not an option? I mean, it's generally not the situation, but ...
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
I know its not a reliable tell, but how fast did he shove? Like, I doubt he instashoves here with TT, JJ or even QQ. Even with great odds I think this is a fold. Against JJ+ and two overs with a FD (AQhh AKhh) you are about 25/75. [/ QUOTE ] I see posts like this all the time. Maybe you are right, maybe not. But I'm pretty sure I have never seen a reg fold JJ in a spot like this, ever. In villains spot, I shove a lot of hands, and a lot of bluffs, especially vs. ppl who 3-bet a bit liberally. And when I shove, I'm never thinking "Maybe he'll fold JJ", lol. I just have my doubts that any of you who advocate a fold here ever actually do it at the table. And by the way, I snap call because I 3-bet just light enough to piss people off and get bluff-shoved on a lot, and because I am a station. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
[ QUOTE ]
We need about 34% equity to make the call. We get close to that with a range like this : Hand 0: 32.905% 30.53% 02.38% 51678 4027.50 { JJ } Hand 1: 67.095% 64.72% 02.38% 109557 4027.50 { TT+, AdKd, AdQd, AdJd, KdQd } But if we take out TT we are never better then 20%.So we hope here he does this with a pp smaller than JJ or some bluff ? [/ QUOTE ] This range is too wide IMO. You won't see KK-AA here often at all, and you won't see AdJd because we hold the Jd. I think the range is more like: Board: 6s 5d 2d Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 49.223% 45.59% 03.64% 7221 576.00 { QQ-TT, AdKd, AdQd, KdQd } Hand 1: 50.777% 47.14% 03.64% 7467 576.00 { JdJh } Which makes it an easy call. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet pot AI decision NL 100
"You wont see KK-AA here often at all"
umm, what? |
|
|