|
|
#1
11-08-2007, 03:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
54s rr-ed pot
this hand isnt really that interesting but meh.
Villan is a regular albiet not a very good one. He seems tighter and somewhat competent but as far as good v. other decent players, no. (not that i'm really decent but whatever). He and I had a hand on another table earlier: -I open KQo otb, he calls w/A8s in bb. Flop A89, he c/c-s my c-bet. 9 turn, we both check, river Q, he checks and I almost vb but check. (i think against some this is a vb but not this guy, too tight). so ya. we have had rr-ed pot confrontations on past sessions where he rr-es me pf and i float his c-bet (done this twice) with him c/f-ing the turn both times. (we were both deeper). Other times i'll just fold to his c-bet. he likely views me as an aggro TAG. $360 effective, 1/2 6max PF: I open 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] $7 in MP, he RR-es in CO to $25, I call, all else fold. <font color="blue">probably bad but i have fps. </font> ($53) Flop: 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] I check, he bets $35, I call $35 ($123) Turn: 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] I check, he bets $80, I...? (would be like 220 to play if i call this). 
|
|
#2
11-08-2007, 03:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 54s rr-ed pot
meh, you're drawing possibly dead OOP w/out ever taking the initiative vs a villain likely to slowdown if a scare-card hits...figure out how much you have to make on the river and ask yourself if he will call a donk bet that size with whatever his range is.
|
|
#3
11-08-2007, 03:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 54s rr-ed pot
[ QUOTE ]
meh, you're drawing possibly dead OOP w/out ever taking the initiative vs a villain likely to slowdown if a scare-card hits...figure out how much you have to make on the river and ask yourself if he will call a donk bet that size with whatever his range is. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think he is drawing dead here all that much... the 6 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] is obviously much more likely to still be out there than the A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. that said, I don't like this spot at all, I think its a fold (here and PF)
|
|
#4
11-08-2007, 03:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 54s rr-ed pot
I think you have little to no folding equity on the turn here. I hate to do it, but I just call, and either donk the river or check/fold.
Your hand is to strong to fold, and he will be getting such inviting odds to call the river when you shove.
|
|
#7
11-08-2007, 03:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 54s rr-ed pot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Your hand is to strong to fold [/ QUOTE ] We have 5 high...a draw, are OOP, and can't be sure we are even going to get paid off if we hit. [/ QUOTE ] When I have 54hh in a 3bet pot, and I see the 2h, and 3h, it takes me more convincing than that to muck. If I muck here, next time I open a pot with any suited connector, and I get 3bet, I learn my lesson ,and I muck.
|
|
#8
11-08-2007, 03:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 54s rr-ed pot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Your hand is to strong to fold [/ QUOTE ] We have 5 high...a draw, are OOP, and can't be sure we are even going to get paid off if we hit. [/ QUOTE ] When I have 54hh in a 3bet pot, and I see the 2h, and 3h, it takes me more convincing than that to muck. If I muck here, next time I open a pot with any suited connector, and I get 3bet, I learn my lesson ,and I muck. [/ QUOTE ] ehhh... what do you mean it takes more convincing than that? what more convincing do you need? although i do agree with you about pf (for the most part), the first part of your argument is silly, imo
|
|
#9
11-08-2007, 04:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 54s rr-ed pot
Ok, convincing isn't the best term, as we don't need to be a hand reading genius to know the nut low is no good right now. But without a made hand, I am pretty happy with this board, and my concealed hand if I hit. If villan has KK, and Kh falls, I'll stack off and I'm Ok with that, but I peel 1 more here.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
