|
|
#21
11-18-2007, 07:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $60 I know someone is calling but still
i know i said fold like a year ago or whenever this was posted, but there is soooo much dead. i think if the opener isnt a nit you can do this as even when he calls you'll maintain decent pot equity most of the time (youre not that often dominate without that read I would think).
|
|
#22
11-18-2007, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60 I know someone is calling but still
The main thing I don't like about it is that the initial raiser has <10 bb's, and I think premium hands are a big part of a lot of people's range here.
|
|
#23
11-18-2007, 08:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60 I know someone is calling but still
[ QUOTE ]
The main thing I don't like about it is that the initial raiser has <10 bb's, and I think premium hands are a big part of a lot of people's range here. [/ QUOTE ] Which is why you have to pay attention to the villains -- knowing who will limp or make a bet, but not go all-in with < 10BB with premiums is so damn important. With the severe multi-tabling that everyone does, it's often hard to pay close enough attention to make note of this tendency. I wonder if someone could write a PT SQL query to identify these villains. In general, unless the raiser or I am severely short stacked, I'm dumping KQ to a raise. Jeff
|
|
#24
11-18-2007, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $60 I know someone is calling but still
[ QUOTE ]
The main thing I don't like about it is that the initial raiser has <10 bb's, and I think premium hands are a big part of a lot of people's range here. [/ QUOTE ] Good point however I feel like this hand was prob not vs a reg and it was over a year ago so I think that his 3x isn't neecessarily that huge.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
