|
|
|
|
#1
11-30-2007, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 78s line deep: 600NL
regarding the flop check, I do agree that betting flop would be optimal. Only reason I didn't was because I 3bet him 2 times previously and took it after a c-bet and I had thrash hands then too. I felt that he would prolly bluff raise me this time so hence the check.
Turn I could see both betting and checking here. But considering that the hand checked through on the turn, isn't a river raise mandatory here? I agree that if I bet turn, I should most likely just call river. BTW, this hand was just a line check and by no means asking for help on the river cause I believe that it's a really easy fold on the river. Way played, I think that the river raise is quite standard, anyone wanna tell me why it's not? 
|
|
#2
12-01-2007, 03:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 78s line deep: 600NL
[ QUOTE ]
I 3bet him 2 times previously and took it after a c-bet and I had thrash hands then too. I felt that he would prolly bluff raise me this time so hence the check. [/ QUOTE ] ummm, maybe let him win a pot and don't 3bet him with 78s this time?
|
|
#3
12-01-2007, 06:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 78s line deep: 600NL
I'm raising this river vs a fish all day. I think we have to fold to the 3 bet, but I feel like there's a ton of value being left on the table by just calling the river bet
|
|
#4
12-01-2007, 06:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 78s line deep: 600NL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I 3bet him 2 times previously and took it after a c-bet and I had thrash hands then too. I felt that he would prolly bluff raise me this time so hence the check. [/ QUOTE ] ummm, maybe let him win a pot and don't 3bet him with 78s this time? [/ QUOTE ] Woah dude, are you saying that game context should be a factor when deciding to make marginal plays? Your whacky ideas will never make it here!
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
