|
|
#1
11-03-2007, 01:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
rounders - AA999 v. AAA99
So I just saw Rounders for the first time ever. I saw the hand where Matt Damon lost his whole bankroll against the Russian KGB guy with AA999 against AAA99. For those of you who have seen the movie, what do you think of Matt Damon's play of moving all in after he thinks the KGB hit his flush on the river and bet out. Would you have just called or would you have moved all in thinking it was nearly impossible he had AA?
|
|
#2
11-03-2007, 01:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rounders - AA999 v. AAA99
one more: what did teddy have in that last hand of the film when he flat-called a button raise, made big overbets on both flop and turn even though the other guy told him pretty much what he had ("alright, teddy, i call or else i won´t respect myself in the morning" lollllllllllllllll) and overbet shoved the river, which brought an ace, exclaiming "that ace could not have helped you. i BET IT ALL" (lollllllllllll)?
AA once again?
|
|
#3
11-03-2007, 01:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rounders - AA999 v. AAA99
You should post this hand in the High Stakes NL forum, and pretend this is a hand that happened to you. They love that there!
|
|
#6
11-03-2007, 04:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rounders - AA999 v. AAA99
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Cooler. Anyone who likes money is moving in on the river there. [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] Even playing with your own roll? The Cincinnati Kid was just as good as last night. Check-raising his full-boat to a possible str8 flush? Oops, was that a spoiler? :-)
|
|
#8
11-03-2007, 10:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rounders - AA999 v. AAA99
Pay hyim hees munnay.
|
|
#9
11-03-2007, 11:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: rounders - AA999 v. AAA99
[ QUOTE ]
Cooler. Anyone who isnt passive/weak-tight is moving in on the river there. [/ QUOTE ] I loved the DVD commentary where he thought that Mike should have checked called the second nuts instead of moving in.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
