|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: My Sharkscope stats are off by: | |||
| Results, please |
   
|
5 | 8.20% |
| 0 % |
  
|
35 | 57.38% |
| 1-3 % |
  
|
13 | 21.31% |
| 4-6 % |
  
|
2 | 3.28% |
| > 6 % |
  
|
6 | 9.84% |
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#151
10-20-2007, 01:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
Guys - it is much easier to use a results based detection criteria for fixed limit hands. Even a short sample can be conclusive proof of anamolous play. For example, if you have a 100 hand sample of a player in your DB, and they are winning at several hundred BB/100 over that sample, it is extremely likely something fishy is going on (dumping or cheating). With NL, it is more difficult to draw these types of conclusions, because it could just be the result of several stackings. I am working on some scripts to detect anamolous patterns based on several derived parameters. I'm looking for some help from decent windows coders and stats guys.
|
|
#152
10-20-2007, 01:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just gonna repeat myself with regard to trying to implicate more people ITT: hand histories or it didn't happen hand histories or it didn't happen hand histories or it didn't happen hand histories or it didn't happen hand histories or it didn't happen (oh and I'll probably wind up banning the next guy to teach a lesson) [/ QUOTE ] I have been reviewing the one hand history I have (10-10 100K) and that was where I got the name...if he's legit that's fine. FWIW I didn't notice anything that would suggest a superuser in the HH (other than a few hands on the player I mentioned that could be a coincidence) but of course it is much easier with a complete hand history than a partial one. It seems much easier to use process of elimination in these HH's, using several different players history, I'll send you the one I have if you like. |
|
#154
10-20-2007, 02:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
If anyone out there reading is familiar with decompiling and has experience in decoding assembly, please get with me offline.
Also, if anyone out there has the old AP client files and hasn't signed on with it in a long time (pre-v8 update, preferably v7.1.5.0), please get with me offline. |
|
#155
10-20-2007, 02:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
[ QUOTE ]
If anyone out there reading is familiar with decompiling and has experience in decoding assembly, please get with me offline. Also, if anyone out there has the old AP client files and hasn't signed on with it in a long time (pre-v8 update, preferably v7.1.5.0), please get with me offline. [/ QUOTE ] To what end? I might on my other machine. |
|
#156
10-20-2007, 02:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
[ QUOTE ]
Also, if anyone out there has the old AP client files and hasn't signed on with it in a long time (pre-v8 update, preferably v7.1.5.0), please get with me offline. [/ QUOTE ] I have an old laptop with AP on it that I haven't used in probably a year. |
|
#157
10-20-2007, 02:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
[ QUOTE ]
If anyone out there reading is familiar with decompiling and has experience in decoding assembly, please get with me offline. Also, if anyone out there has the old AP client files and hasn't signed on with it in a long time (pre-v8 update, preferably v7.1.5.0), please get with me offline. [/ QUOTE ] LOL...I have v5.7.0 |
|
#158
10-20-2007, 03:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
Thanks for all the help guys. I got what I what I was looking for, we don't need 75 more posts on what version everyone has.
I could still use someone proficient in assembly to collaborate, however. And "offline" means a place where Costa Ricans can't see, donkeys. |
|
#159
10-20-2007, 03:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
There is an ugly story in the San Jose Mercury News
[ QUOTE ] Sure, Buzz has gotten caught up in the poker craze. But we've never plunked down our online cash. Just old-world that way; never felt like we could trust things to be on the up-and-up. Now we know why. As analyzed by the Freakonomics blog at nytimes.com, the site Absolute Poker is being investigated in Canada regarding a tournament in which a player didn't fold a hand pre-flop for 20 minutes, then suddenly folded pre-flop when his opponent had pocket kings. When he stayed in hands all the way through, it was with suspiciously weak cards that were somehow good enough. Some of the player's opponents requested a log of the tournament, and when they got it, they discovered that an observer was watching all of the hands the player played. The observer's IP address was traced to Absolute Poker and one of its owners. The implication is that somebody was looking at all players' hole cards. So, if the illegality of playing doesn't sway anyone, this should. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#160
10-20-2007, 03:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: We haven\'t won yet: latest (10/19) cliff\'s notes on AP scandal
[ QUOTE ]
Thanks for all the help guys. I got what I what I was looking for, we don't need 75 more posts on what version everyone has. I could still use someone proficient in assembly to collaborate, however. And "offline" means a place where Costa Ricans can't see, donkeys. [/ QUOTE ] I took assembly classes in university ( 3 years ago). Wish it was more current because I just remember how annoying it was. |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
