#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
[ QUOTE ]
BUT HOW CAN YOU FOLD GETTING 56:1...someone needs a refresher on his math, ldo. [/ QUOTE ]You're dumb. If he has no pair he's drawing dead someone needs a refresher on the game of poker. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
[x] Not always about pot odds.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
but he said it was a simple math game. guess he had like 5 high
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
[ QUOTE ]
thought [/ QUOTE ] I don't thunk this is right. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
[ QUOTE ]
he probably had fold to any bet or check fold auto clicked [/ QUOTE ] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] he probably had fold to any bet or check fold auto clicked [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Lol, genius. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
He should've called for the implied open fold odds on the river.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
[x] [x] not needed in title
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
[x] Needs $30,000,000 bankroll to play 5k/10k nl and if calls and loses will only have $29,999,400
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: [x] lol @ sbrugby
[ QUOTE ]
[x] Needs $30,000,000 bankroll to play 5k/10k nl and if calls and loses will only have $29,999,400 [/ QUOTE ] this makes me want to throw up |
|
|