#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 - AA, big pot, lots of action.
[ QUOTE ]
Sample sizes would help but UTG is the type to overplay his hands; he shouldn't have worse than KK here ever if he was playing right but it wouldn't be out of the question for him to show up with AT. The caller almost never has a better hand once he calls 4th. [/ QUOTE ] AF converges very slowly. Also some players are very aggro in blind battles etc. Which would be totally different than this spot. Capping this flop with AT is a little bit too stupid given all the action? Also if he holds AT we don't really want him to fold the turn. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 - AA, big pot, lots of action.
It would be pretty stellar on his part if UTG+1 had TT, but I'm doubting it because I think the instinct move is to check TT there. I think he has KK or AA almost always. Raise the turn.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 - AA, big pot, lots of action.
[ QUOTE ]
It would be pretty stellar on his part if UTG+1 had TT, but I'm doubting it because I think the instinct move is to check TT there. I think he has KK or AA almost always. Raise the turn. [/ QUOTE ] QQ never? Also given pf he can be pretty sure to get some action when he leads. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1/2 - AA, big pot, lots of action.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It would be pretty stellar on his part if UTG+1 had TT, but I'm doubting it because I think the instinct move is to check TT there. I think he has KK or AA almost always. Raise the turn. [/ QUOTE ] QQ never? Also given pf he can be pretty sure to get some action when he leads. [/ QUOTE ] I think that's pretty fast for QQ given what hero has done. I think it's much easier for him to get hyper with KK than QQ. I'm not saying that leading TT isn't very smart; I'm saying that I usually don't give my opponents credit for being very smart. |
|
|