100K hands in a month possible?

[KurtSF]

[ QUOTE ]
curtains - just play the smallest stakes. You would probably end up winning there just by showing up.

This is definitely possible. I could do this. Especially if you allowed me to mix NL, limit and SNG's or whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

No SNGs. Obvious hand-count fluff.

[MicroBob]

I really don't see why since so many SNG's get to 5 or 6 handed fairly quickly and you actually do have to think a little bit.
I just wanted to try to get around the 24 table max.
but if you insist that it has to be cash-games only I still think I can do this.

[jmill2511]

Uhh I would do 500k in a month for the right amount in a heartbeat. It wouldn't be hard at all with the right incentive.

[Grinding2Ecstasy]

very possible, a couple of Full Ring players do this. I'm gonna get about 75k in this month myself.

[xxThe_Lebowskixx]

ive played 100k hands a month in the past playing only 5 tables average.

[andy099]

100k is a piece of piss for anyone who doesn't do anything else, low stakes pro's should be getting this many hands a month easily imo. i mean i did 80k last month and i goto uni as well(although failing)

[Python49]

Ummmmm, less than 100k hands a month is lazy. I've had 1 monnth under 100k hands since graduating and playing full time.

[Kirbynator]

Beat: Played 10 000 hands this month

Brag: 53k [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[markksman]

The funny thing is to read the ridiculous number of hands people play and then have people in other threads tell me poker is an easy way to make money. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[mookboi]

[ QUOTE ]
The funny thing is to read the ridiculous number of hands people play and then have people in other threads tell me poker is an easy way to make money. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]