|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Interesting hand in position against UTG NIT
Folding PF and calling river are both bad.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Interesting hand in position against UTG NIT
Would calling with AQs preflop been terrible?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Interesting hand in position against UTG NIT
[ QUOTE ]
Would calling with AQs preflop been terrible? [/ QUOTE ] No. min-raising turn with AQ might be though. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Interesting hand in position against UTG NIT
Against this player raising from UTG, I'd call with AQs in position but fold it if I were in the blinds.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Interesting hand in position against UTG NIT
With the nit's range 88 is the only real possible holding with an 8 which is really improbable. It has to be AK or AQ given the way the hand played out and judging by the strength of his turn play I'd lean to AK.
AA is another possibility, but I tend not put much weight in the case A hitting the flop. Anyway I stoved it with a bias away from AQ: Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 10 games 0.005 secs 2,000 games/sec Board: 8c 8s Ad 6s Qd Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 30.000% 00.00% 30.00% 0 3.00 { AcKc } Hand 1: 70.000% 40.00% 30.00% 4 3.00 { AA, 88, AKs, AcQc, AdQd, AhQh, AKo, AcQd, AcQh, AcQs, AdQc, AdQh, AhQc } Doesn't look like the odds are good enough to call. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Interesting hand in position against UTG NIT
I think you could cut down a few AQ combinations IMO
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Interesting hand in position against UTG NIT
Just using AQs for the stove analysis should work. That's probably pretty close to accurate.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: Interesting hand in position against UTG NIT
[ QUOTE ]
Folding PF and calling river are both bad. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|