i just analyzed my 25/50 results for this year - Page 3

Gildwulf · #1 03-16-2007, 11:14 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Post deleted by Gildwulf

[/ QUOTE ]

Something to the tune of: "die shortstacker, die"?

[/ QUOTE ]

similar

snagglepuss · #2 03-16-2007, 11:58 AM

chance this is calculated properly: .05%

JKratzer · #3 03-16-2007, 12:51 PM

[ QUOTE ]
world-class ratholer

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
POKER IS GAY.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

kyleb · #4 03-16-2007, 01:33 PM

this is what you get for shortstacking obviously

ImsaKidd · #5 03-16-2007, 01:39 PM

[ QUOTE ]
this is what you get for shortstacking obviously

[/ QUOTE ]

Other people's money?

Sponger. · #6 03-16-2007, 01:45 PM

[ QUOTE ]
difference: ($19,478.89)

[/ QUOTE ]

How many of your buyins is this? This doesn't seem too bad.

bigt439 · #7 03-16-2007, 01:56 PM

this makes me so happy...

learn to play poker

stinkypete · #8 03-16-2007, 03:21 PM

[ QUOTE ]
this makes me so happy...

learn to play poker

[/ QUOTE ]

will that make me run good? should i learn to play a style where my expectation is much lower just for the good karma?

stinkypete · #9 03-16-2007, 03:20 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
difference: ($19,478.89)

[/ QUOTE ]

How many of your buyins is this? This doesn't seem too bad.

[/ QUOTE ]

running 19.5 buyins below expectation over 1776 hands is pretty bad.

sledghammer · #10 03-16-2007, 10:42 PM

[ QUOTE ]
number of all in hands: 77
total equity after money went in: $68,713.76
total money won: $49,234.87

difference: ($19,478.89)

chances of running this bad or worse: ~0.5%

POKER IS GAY. STARS IS RIGGED. FU ALL.

and yes, i calculated all this [censored] because i hate life.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is misleading. Just use your standard deviation to calculate this.