Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-28-2007, 05:54 AM
1fineday 1fineday is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
Default 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

Villain is 17/11/1.68
Should Hero bet the river?

Full Tilt Poker, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BB: $53.75
UTG: $59.15
CO: $35.50
BTN: $24.65
Hero (SB): $113.60

Pre-Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB)
2 folds, <font color="red">BTN raises to $0.85</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $2.80</font>, BB folds, BTN calls $1.95

Flop: ($5.85) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $3.50</font>, BTN calls $3.50

Turn: ($12.85) 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN checks

River: ($12.85) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $6</font>, BTN calls $6
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:00 AM
tweak tweak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 48
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

He called your flop bet, either with a draw or some of the board or maybe just over cards.

I think that you should just check/fold the river, seens you checked the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:12 AM
1fineday 1fineday is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

But Queen could be a good card to bluff... Since Hero 3-bet preflop and checked the turn he is likely to have overcards and Q could help him. Moreover, Q completes some draws that Villain can be afraid of
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:15 AM
SDone SDone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UCSD
Posts: 492
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

[ QUOTE ]
But Queen could be a good card to bluff... Since Hero 3-bet preflop and checked the turn he is likely to have overcards and Q could help him. Moreover, Q completes some draws that Villain can be afraid of

[/ QUOTE ]

Usually if you're going to bluff you want to bet more than half the pot.

Clearly hero shouldn't have bet the river, because villian called.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:27 AM
1fineday 1fineday is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

We don't know what Villain is going to do while we decide to bet or not to bet. Maybe he calls in 10% of the time and folds in 90%
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:35 AM
SDone SDone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UCSD
Posts: 492
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

What do you really think you're going to get the villian to fold there?
Also, it's more likely that villian had a draw than anything.
Sick call Kenny Tran says he had QJ, or dem pocket 7's.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-28-2007, 06:35 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

Just call preflop, there is no need to 3bet this hand out of the blinds. As played, what incentive have you given him to fold? You bet weak on the flop, check the turn, and bet weak on the river. Do you want him to put you on runner runner flush? I think that if you want to bluff him out you need to bet bigger on the flop and bet the turn aswell but my opinion is that you should call preflop, and as played, bet more on the flop then give up when called.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:13 AM
1fineday 1fineday is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

Ty all for your answers
Ama, but why 3-betting preflop is bad here?
Villain has a pretty big range of hands that he raises from the button and that will fold to 3-bet or c-bet. If we flop a set it's easier to put all our money in the rr pot.
It's a kind of 3-betting light
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-28-2007, 08:16 AM
ama0330 ama0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crushing
Posts: 5,704
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

[ QUOTE ]
Ty all for your answers
Ama, but why 3-betting preflop is bad here?
Villain has a pretty big range of hands that he raises from the button and that will fold to 3-bet or c-bet. If we flop a set it's easier to put all our money in the rr pot.
It's a kind of 3-betting light

[/ QUOTE ]

Its turning a mid strength hand into a bluff in a rereaised pot out of position which can get really expensive. I would rather 3bet 72o here than 66
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-28-2007, 09:26 AM
1fineday 1fineday is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 80
Default Re: 66 - playing in rr pot with no set

don't understand=((((
He's TAG, why 3-betting small pocket pairs against him OOP is bad? If the flop contains cards that are higher than 6, than 66 play exactly like 72o OOP in a rr pot( c-bet on the flop and if Villain doesn't fold, check/fold on all streets)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.