#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl flopped fullhouse.. badly played.
def. lead the flop. If you're itching for a check/raise you could stack a donk the turn after.
Reason you want to lead is because its a good flop to bluff at and try to take down; given that you're in the blinds a c/r is only getting action from a 9. If you lead flop you'll get called by a wide range, and most of that range will fire the turn if you check it; you get 2 bets out of a marginal hand and your check-raise will get called by a 9. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl flopped fullhouse.. badly played.
[ QUOTE ]
Reason you want to lead is because its a good flop to bluff at and try to take down; given that you're in the blinds a c/r is only getting action from a 9. [/ QUOTE ] If this is the case then surely c/r ATC would be profitable no? Not saying that c/r is the best line, I prefer leading like the rest of you, but I don't think c/r is as bad as it's being made out to be here. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl flopped fullhouse.. badly played.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Reason you want to lead is because its a good flop to bluff at and try to take down; given that you're in the blinds a c/r is only getting action from a 9. [/ QUOTE ] If this is the case then surely c/r ATC would be profitable no? Not saying that c/r is the best line, I prefer leading like the rest of you, but I don't think c/r is as bad as it's being made out to be here. [/ QUOTE ] Its not always profitable but sure you could c/r ATC and expect to see a fold often. Def. has to be the right situation but i've done that on a paired board. You're going to have to explain your defense of c/r further because i don't really understand what case you're making for it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100nl flopped fullhouse.. badly played.
I don't want to make a case for c/r because I think leading is better [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
|