Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-31-2007, 08:17 PM
Joseph Hewes Joseph Hewes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 97
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

lol. Omaha's hard.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-01-2007, 12:44 AM
DanielM DanielM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 34
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

Your hand analysis is correct. But they weren't hired for their poker acumen, they were hired because they’re entertaining and they’re willing to work 18 hour days.

I suggest you tell everyone at your home game you learned how to play poker from watching ESPN and those guys from “The Heartland Poker Tour” Everyone will think you’re a schmuck, and you’ll make more $$.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-01-2007, 12:46 AM
john voight john voight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SALAZARRRRRRRR
Posts: 2,653
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

I just felt like attacking who ever said the commentators were wrong.

I have no idea what hand was in question, and i doubt i would know how to read the hand even if i had the info.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:57 AM
holdme holdme is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100k in 20 days
Posts: 6,277
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

OMMMFG HIS TOURNAMENT LIFE AT RISK ON A DRAW!??!/
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-01-2007, 01:47 PM
otnemem otnemem is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hobo Ken
Posts: 3,006
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

(A) 90% of the people in this thread are retarded. He had trip 9s, not Queens up.

(B)[ QUOTE ]
But they weren't hired for their poker acumen, they were hired because they’re entertaining and they’re willing to work 18 hour days.

[/ QUOTE ]
You're even more retarded than the rest of the people in this thread. You think they sit around for 18 hours a day doing live commentary? Really????
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-01-2007, 05:30 PM
Rottersod Rottersod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Where I Want To Be
Posts: 3,154
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

[ QUOTE ]
I just felt like attacking who ever said the commentators were wrong.

I have no idea what hand was in question, and i doubt i would know how to read the hand even if i had the info.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah. Riiiiight.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-01-2007, 11:15 PM
Joseph Hewes Joseph Hewes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 97
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

[ QUOTE ]
I just felt like attacking who ever said the commentators were wrong.

I have no idea what hand was in question, and i doubt i would know how to read the hand even if i had the info.

[/ QUOTE ]
lol. Nice try.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-02-2007, 01:18 AM
john voight john voight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: SALAZARRRRRRRR
Posts: 2,653
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

sorry guys, I was actually drunk at the time of both of thoses posts.

OBV he head a FH
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-02-2007, 03:46 AM
checktowin checktowin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

Norman Chad = teh nutz
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-02-2007, 05:55 AM
uuser uuser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Default Re: ESPN analysts miscues

What's happening here? There are so many retards here? I'm not surprised anymore about the donkey who pushed AI against my AAQQQ while he thought he had AQQQQ while he actually had AxQQQ. LOL.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.