|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is a unit? | |||
| My average bet (in other words, I sometimes bet less than a unit). |
   
|
20 | 48.78% |
| My smallest bet (in other words, I always bet between 1 and x units). |
  
|
15 | 36.59% |
| What's a unit? I bet an amount proportional to my advantage (Kelly or some variation thereof). |
  
|
6 | 14.63% |
| Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#101
10-01-2007, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would put Cleveland and Anaheim over any NL team, but that's about it. I'd put the Red Sox over Arizona and the Cubs, and about even with the Phillies and Rockies. Arizona is worse than any AL team in the playoffs. [/ QUOTE ] Considering the Yankees and Red Sox are the two best teams in the AL, and therefore the majors, this does not make sense. [/ QUOTE ] Considering the Yankees and Red Sox lost five of six to the Colorado Rockies, this makes perfect sense. FYP. 
|
|
#102
10-01-2007, 03:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I would put Cleveland and Anaheim over any NL team, but that's about it. I'd put the Red Sox over Arizona and the Cubs, and about even with the Phillies and Rockies. Arizona is worse than any AL team in the playoffs. [/ QUOTE ] Considering the Yankees and Red Sox are the two best teams in the AL, and therefore the majors, this does not make sense. [/ QUOTE ] Considering the Yankees and Red Sox lost five of six to the Colorado Rockies, this makes perfect sense. FYP. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#103
10-01-2007, 03:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
As much as it's fun to clown the downie kid for not grasping sample size and stuff, it's equally frue that being the better team isn't that important over a 7 game series.
Signed, Watching your team win 116 games and knowing that it's meaningless eats a bag of dicks.
|
|
#104
10-01-2007, 03:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
BTW, anyone check Peavy's postseason stats lately?
Not pretty. 0-2, 9.2 IP, 19 H, 13 R, 13 ER, 3 HR, 4 BB, 5 SO, a WHIP around 2.4. Of course, today's a different day.
|
|
#106
10-01-2007, 04:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
i think if fogg pitches OK this one is definitely going to the rockies.
i expect a very good but not "super amazing" perforance from peavy but i don't think the padres can produce enough offense without bradley to overcome the main 5 from the rockies. plus spilbourghs and matsui are not exactly offensive slouches. the rockies just have too much offense and bullpen if fogg can pitch semi-ok.
|
|
#108
10-01-2007, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
[ QUOTE ]
There is nothing more retarded than picking individual baseball games. Although picking against Jake Peavy might be up there. [/ QUOTE ] Hey, in the last 17 Phillies games, I was only wrong 4 times.
|
|
#110
10-01-2007, 04:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: finally gonna have a tiebreaker game
[ QUOTE ]
If we can get 5 good innings from Fogg this team can compete with anyone. [/ QUOTE ] agreed. if fogg pitches like 5 innings with 2 ER the rockies win for sure imo.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
