#1
|
|||
|
|||
2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
Hi there,
I was wondering if anyone has enough data to get an idea of how much BB/100 is paid on rake at 2/4 and 3/6 level on Pokerstars. My guess is that 3/6 is gonna be WAY more expensive than 2/4 as in 2/4 a lot of small pot are not raked (its 1$ for 20 so all pot under 20 arent raked), making it 3/6 A LOT harder to beat for the same ammout than 2/4. Anyone with meaningfull data on this ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
This stuff converges pretty quickly so these numbers I am sure are good, about 100k hands ttl.
Lmt % Pot Pot Avg Rake 2/4 2.89% 24 .70 3/6 3.16% 36 1.14 5/10 3.14% 59 1.88 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
nervmind you edited first
I was talking about 6max btw |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
These are full ring numbers. You want to post in the small stakes shorthanded forum for that info.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
Oh right I am sorry, if any mod could move my thread please.
Sorry about that, still thanks for the info. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2/4 vs 3/6 on Pokerstars
[ QUOTE ]
This stuff converges pretty quickly so these numbers I am sure are good, about 100k hands ttl. Lmt % Pot Pot Avg Rake 2/4 2.89% 24 .70 3/6 3.16% 36 1.14 5/10 3.14% 59 1.88 [/ QUOTE ] I have about the same numbers. I always thought we would pay less rake when the limit goes up, now I understand it's due to the breakdown of when you pay rake, but isn't this is bit strange? |
|
|