Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 10-26-2007, 04:50 PM
bilbo-san bilbo-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In ur game, pickin off ur bluffz
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: Yes?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I'm not sure which is more retarded, 3betting 87o, or checking behind with 87o on a board like this once you've 3-bet.

Oh, wait, I do. It's checking behind. At least then you aren't falling into sunk-costs-matter fallacies.

[/ QUOTE ]

um lol? First off if you're going to quote me and call me out in a thread at least have a decent argument. 3betting 87o IP is FINE against certain opponents. And checking 87o behind is STANDARD on this board. Are you serious?

Seriously you have no concept of hand ranges.

[/ QUOTE ]

3 betting 87o is pretty apeshit aggro. So is A3o. I love how people watch some aba videos and think they got skillz to 3bet every hand IP (where you should be 3betting more, not less).

Further, why are you checking 87 here? Pot Control? You think you're going to show down the winning pair of 7s? To hit your really dirty 9 outer? WTF.

And don't [censored] talk to me about hand ranges when we have, like NO READ on villain. WTF!?
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 10-26-2007, 04:57 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: Yes?

I'm not sure if check/shove on the turn is better than check/call. Depends on how aggro he is and how he reads hands.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 10-26-2007, 04:59 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: Yes?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I'm not sure which is more retarded, 3betting 87o, or checking behind with 87o on a board like this once you've 3-bet.

Oh, wait, I do. It's checking behind. At least then you aren't falling into sunk-costs-matter fallacies.

[/ QUOTE ]

um lol? First off if you're going to quote me and call me out in a thread at least have a decent argument. 3betting 87o IP is FINE against certain opponents. And checking 87o behind is STANDARD on this board. Are you serious?

Seriously you have no concept of hand ranges.

[/ QUOTE ]

3 betting 87o is pretty apeshit aggro. So is A3o. I love how people watch some aba videos and think they got skillz to 3bet every hand IP (where you should be 3betting more, not less).

Further, why are you checking 87 here? Pot Control? You think you're going to show down the winning pair of 7s? To hit your really dirty 9 outer? WTF.

And don't [censored] talk to me about hand ranges when we have, like NO READ on villain. WTF!?

[/ QUOTE ]

3-betting 87o or A3o is no different than 98s or w/e else tags like to 3-bet. Image, the opponent and FE is more important than your actual hand. I'd rather 3-bet stuff like A5o and flat in position with pretty hands like 98s.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 10-26-2007, 05:02 PM
blah-blah-blah blah-blah-blah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 667
Default Re: Yes?

lol "pretty hands like 98s"

totally agree tho.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 10-29-2007, 02:01 PM
SwingVelvet SwingVelvet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 179
Default Re: Yes?

[ QUOTE ]

3 betting 87o is pretty apeshit aggro. So is A3o. I love how people watch some aba videos and think they got skillz to 3bet every hand IP (where you should be 3betting more, not less).

[/ QUOTE ]

Bilbo,

did you mean you should be 3betting more oop? and less ip?

anyone can explain if this was a typo or not?

thanks,
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 10-29-2007, 02:47 PM
Speedlimits Speedlimits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,780
Default Re: Yes?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

3 betting 87o is pretty apeshit aggro. So is A3o. I love how people watch some aba videos and think they got skillz to 3bet every hand IP (where you should be 3betting more, not less).

[/ QUOTE ]

Bilbo,

did you mean you should be 3betting more oop? and less ip?

anyone can explain if this was a typo or not?

thanks,

[/ QUOTE ]

You should be 3betting more IP than OOP. Yeah his post doesnt make any sense.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 10-29-2007, 04:22 PM
scallop scallop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: YouTube: Vader Sessions.
Posts: 861
Default Re: Yes?

dont think that is entirely tru.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.