Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2007, 07:40 PM
Pog0 Pog0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,366
Default 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

3/6NL. 600 stacks.
I, 24/16 in CO w/ Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
20/15 reasonable TAG on BTN.

PF: I raise to 21, BTN calls, blinds fold.

Flop ($51): 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

I bet $42, BTN calls.

Turn ($135): 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

I... ($535 each to play)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-16-2007, 07:47 PM
invid invid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DA OC WEEEEOOO
Posts: 442
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

c/rai
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-16-2007, 07:50 PM
obiedman obiedman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: \"If it shows their cards why did you keep betting?\"
Posts: 1,835
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

yup i like a c/rai as well. you could lead for like 115, but i don't like it nearly as much as c/r
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-16-2007, 07:51 PM
spyu spyu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 420
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

I'm assuming it's 4 handed. If he's a reasonable TAG I would say his range of hands that made it to the turn are AQ, KQ, QJ, Q10, J10, 99-AA to a lesser extent, but quite possible depending on his reraising range PF and his view of you and what you're raising range is.
So basically you're really ahead of 1 hand here up to 3 if you include 10s and Js. The turn is a decent card for you because you pick up a draw and have chances to chop w/ QJ, and KQ. Given this board I doubt villain will fold any of the hands that are currently beating you so I would check and see what he does and call a reasonable turn bet of up to the pot.
But take this with a grain of salt because I play live full ring.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-16-2007, 07:52 PM
jpsnow jpsnow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 366
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

[ QUOTE ]
c/rai

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont really ever like leading here
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-16-2007, 07:54 PM
jpsnow jpsnow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 366
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

CC probably isnt horrible
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2007, 08:00 PM
mdkrahn mdkrahn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 868
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

I'm not sure what crai accomplishes.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-16-2007, 08:03 PM
Borned_Luckbox1 Borned_Luckbox1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 510
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

What should he call with?

C/C imo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-16-2007, 08:07 PM
mike0292 mike0292 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: getting owned
Posts: 1,262
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

c/r ai > c/c >>>> anything else
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-16-2007, 08:10 PM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: 3/6 So many good options, but which one is best?

if he can call you with 88/fold KQ then crai is good. o/w it seems like you're doing it to avoid an awkward river spot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.