Writing Squeeze in the chat, do u think it's against the rules?

[Sciolist]

[ QUOTE ]
Freyalise,

You noted the hand number and OP's screen name, right?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not going to look at his account because that's cheating. If I did, I'd be willing to bet that OP made this post after being warned.

[ReptileHouse]

[ QUOTE ]
There's players behind him left to act, so he's influencing the action. OP should STFU next time.

And yes, it collides DIRECTLY with that rule.

[/ QUOTE ]

Winner.

[Rek]

[ QUOTE ]
Rek, do you continue to play at stars?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything they do - unlike some people. Is it ok if I have a view on this?

[Mcbrag]

Whatever, all the dude said was that he got squeezed. whoop de doo. You guys are making mountains out of absolutely nothing. He's saying that with the players yet to act behind him he can no longer continue with the hand, it has nothing to do with the holding of the reraiser.

[Rek]

[ QUOTE ]
Whatever, all the dude said was that he got squeezed. whoop de doo. You guys are making mountains out of absolutely nothing. He's saying that with the players yet to act behind him he can no longer continue with the hand, it has nothing to do with the holding of the reraiser.

[/ QUOTE ]

And this is why the penalties should be harder. One person gets warned, then warned again providing people take time to report them. Then dumbasses like this still don't get it and so other players do the same. It is never frigging ending.

What is wrong with having T&C's than mean something and violations are harsher. At the moment the only people that suffer are the ones that abide by the rules.

[train.]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Rek, do you continue to play at stars?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything they do - unlike some people. Is it ok if I have a view on this?

[/ QUOTE ]

it's quite ok. but if it bothered me as much as it seems to bother you i'd find a place to play where i liked their rules and enforcement better. find a different horse to beat fps.

[Rek]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Rek, do you continue to play at stars?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything they do - unlike some people. Is it ok if I have a view on this?

[/ QUOTE ]

it's quite ok. but if it bothered me as much as it seems to bother you i'd find a place to play where i liked their rules and enforcement better. find a different horse to beat fps.

[/ QUOTE ]

So your contribution to this thread is to tell me to play elsewhere. Figures.

[train.]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Rek, do you continue to play at stars?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything they do - unlike some people. Is it ok if I have a view on this?

[/ QUOTE ]

it's quite ok. but if it bothered me as much as it seems to bother you i'd find a place to play where i liked their rules and enforcement better. find a different horse to beat fps.

[/ QUOTE ]

So your contribution to this thread is to tell me to play elsewhere. Figures.

[/ QUOTE ]

sweet burn! goot one.

[Alobar]

[ QUOTE ]
Freyalise,

You noted the hand number and OP's screen name, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

[a nonymous]

I report this every time. While I'm ok with the site giving a warning at first, if they do it again they should lose their chat forever (you could make an argument for closing their account completely, though the sites obv wouldn't want that).