#1
|
|||
|
|||
Would you play at RIT tables?
RIT = Run It Twice
Any time players are heads up and one is all in, the remaining cards to be dealt are dealt twice with two pots to be paid out. For example All In pre-flop = 5 cards dealt twice All In flop = turn and river dealt twice All in turn = river dealt twice These would be seperate from normal tables (like speed/fast tables) and RIT would always apply. So would you play NLHE at these types of tables or do you not care much one way or another? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you play at RIT tables?
[ QUOTE ]
RIT = Run It Twice Any time players are heads up and one is all in, the remaining cards to be dealt are dealt twice with two pots to be paid out. For example All In pre-flop = 5 cards dealt twice All In flop = turn and river dealt twice All in turn = river dealt twice These would be seperate from normal tables (like speed/fast tables) and RIT would always apply. So would you play NLHE at these types of tables or do you not care much one way or another? [/ QUOTE ] I'd only play RIT tables in coin flip situations only. otherwise it's retarded. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you play at RIT tables?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] RIT = Run It Twice Any time players are heads up and one is all in, the remaining cards to be dealt are dealt twice with two pots to be paid out. For example All In pre-flop = 5 cards dealt twice All In flop = turn and river dealt twice All in turn = river dealt twice These would be seperate from normal tables (like speed/fast tables) and RIT would always apply. So would you play NLHE at these types of tables or do you not care much one way or another? [/ QUOTE ] I'd only play RIT tables in coin flip situations only. otherwise it's retarded. [/ QUOTE ] Why? Less variance if you RIT. I'd play, but probably only for novelty value. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you play at RIT tables?
Variance is one of the largest reasons fish continue to play. RIT tables would be a terrible idea i.m.o.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you play at RIT tables?
I think such tables could be sick soft for a while. Kind of the same as in split pot games where people can't fold as long as they have some sort of chance for half the pot.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you play at RIT tables?
[ QUOTE ]
Variance is one of the largest reasons fish continue to play. RIT tables would be a terrible idea i.m.o. [/ QUOTE ] I see what you say, but it could very well work the other way, where the fish will never fold their flush draw, since now they are 65% on the flop (obv depending on what you have) to win at least once.... so it might make the games softer... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would you play at RIT tables?
These tables would be SICK soft.
The novelty value would have players wanting to go all-in on practically every hand. It would be a stupid all-in fest of maximum donkyness. It's possible I would convert 100% of my play to NL just for these tables. The chat-box would be hilarious. Almost everyone would have some ridiculous idea of how the RIT turns some hand from underdog to favorite or something. I want these tables and I want them NOW!!! |
|
|