|
|
#41
07-29-2007, 10:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] open limping your sb can work against non-observant players, but i pick up so much dead money from people that open limp their sb to my bb .....its basically free $ [/ QUOTE ] Right. I am saying if the BB routinly checks, I'd rather limp getting 3-1 and outplay them on the flop. If you're not a solid post-flop player or are on 9 tables, you'd probably just want to fold in that spot... [/ QUOTE ] i play 5 tables, and i raise in that spot all the time. my default is to raise my SB against BB until they decide to do something about it. again, free $ [/ QUOTE ] You can have you PAHUD display how much they fold to steals of their BB. I tried it for awhile but I didn't find it to be all that useful. [/ QUOTE ] i dont use huds, site doesnt support it, and the only thing i use huds for anyways is to identify nits 
|
|
#42
07-29-2007, 10:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
can I take a guess: your not playing on FTP or Stars?
PS- comment bout 3 tabling players not winning is just retarded. I can notice a significant improvement in my play(and ptbb/100 win rate) when I am 3 tabling as compared to 6+, and lower variance as well. Its very possible for a non-great player to make 6 figs 3 tabling MSNL. last I checked that was pretty good money.
|
|
#43
07-29-2007, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
[ QUOTE ]
can I take a guess: your not playing on FTP or Stars? PS- comment bout 3 tabling players not winning is just retarded. I can notice a significant improvement in my play(and ptbb/100 win rate) when I am 3 tabling as compared to 6+, and lower variance as well. Its very possible for a non-great player to make 6 figs 3 tabling MSNL. last I checked that was pretty good money. [/ QUOTE ] I didn't say you cannot win; you winrate will obviously be higher. But you can generally win more by playing more than 3 tables as evidenced by pretty much every player in this forum. I was also talking to the OP and not people who play 3 tables in general. Also, the variance is not going to change. 1,000 hands of 3 tabling verus 1,000 hand of 6 tabling will have the same variance. Although as previously stated your winrate will usually be higher when 3 tabling.
|
|
#44
07-29-2007, 10:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also, are you saying that 6-8 BBs is "crushing" the game for players who are 6-9 tabling? I play 3 tables at once, so that I don't miss any bets or lose any value... Obviously the fewer tables you play simultaneously , the higher your win rate per hand. [/ QUOTE ] If you cannot play more than 3 tables there is a good chance that you are a losing player. [/ QUOTE ] omg this is completely wrong [/ QUOTE ] No it isn't. Name one winning player on this forum who never plays more than 3? [/ QUOTE ] i play 4 at most... i my multitabling ratio is 2.23 my winrate at msnl is above 6ptbb/100 over 110k hands.... so yeah
|
|
#45
07-29-2007, 10:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also, are you saying that 6-8 BBs is "crushing" the game for players who are 6-9 tabling? I play 3 tables at once, so that I don't miss any bets or lose any value... Obviously the fewer tables you play simultaneously , the higher your win rate per hand. [/ QUOTE ] If you cannot play more than 3 tables there is a good chance that you are a losing player. [/ QUOTE ] omg this is completely wrong [/ QUOTE ] No it isn't. Name one winning player on this forum who never plays more than 3? [/ QUOTE ] i play 4 at most... i my multitabling ratio is 2.23 my winrate at msnl is above 6ptbb/100 over 110k hands.... so yeah [/ QUOTE ] I guess I'm wrong then. I cannot play anything less than 8 and not be bored unless it is games that high stakes (for me).
|
|
#47
07-29-2007, 10:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I guess I'm wrong then. I cannot play anything less than 8 and not be bored unless it is games that high stakes (for me). [/ QUOTE ] not everyone is you, s h o c k e r [/ QUOTE ] He is pretty much the exception for the good players here.
|
|
#48
07-29-2007, 11:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I guess I'm wrong then. I cannot play anything less than 8 and not be bored unless it is games that high stakes (for me). [/ QUOTE ] not everyone is you, s h o c k e r [/ QUOTE ] He is pretty much the exception for the good players here. [/ QUOTE ] i am positive there are many many great players in msnl that play 2-8 tables and do fine and would not want to play 8+
|
|
#49
07-29-2007, 11:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I guess I'm wrong then. I cannot play anything less than 8 and not be bored unless it is games that high stakes (for me). [/ QUOTE ] not everyone is you, s h o c k e r [/ QUOTE ] He is pretty much the exception for the good players here. [/ QUOTE ] i am positive there are many many great players in msnl that play 2-8 tables and do fine and would not want to play 8+ [/ QUOTE ] There's a big difference between 2-8 and playing no more than 3.
|
|
#50
07-29-2007, 11:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BB/100 ratings...and PT stats
[ QUOTE ]
Also, the variance is not going to change. 1,000 hands of 3 tabling verus 1,000 hand of 6 tabling will have the same variance. Although as previously stated your winrate will usually be higher when 3 tabling. [/ QUOTE ] I think this may be wrong. If win rate is higher then variance is less especially over same number of hands. I think I could be wrong too
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
