#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
people, villain is td8507....hes a station. well played
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
people, villain is td8507....hes a station. well played [/ QUOTE ] Nothing in op mentioned villain being a station, sorry not everyone knows who td85 is. If he is in fact a station, then value bet here is probably better than c/c. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] people, villain is td8507....hes a station. well played [/ QUOTE ] Nothing in op mentioned villain being a station, sorry not everyone knows who td85 is. If he is in fact a station, then value bet here is probably better than c/c. [/ QUOTE ] i mean he is a solid tag...but he does call A LOT of rivers lightly |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
i think its very thin, but correct play. i think he has just a 10 the majority of the time, just got to hope he makes the hero call.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] c/c is the worst usually, shove or check/fold [/ QUOTE ] no, people bluff. its like c/c>shove>c/f. [/ QUOTE ] He called a cr, and called a turn bet. He has something w/ SD value. You think he's going to bluff the river w/ QT? I supposed he could have something like QJcc/A5cc, etc - but I still prefer betting river for value. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
Having position can easily justify calling our c/r with clubs. And given our 1/2 PSB on the turn we almost give him correct odds to continue on the turn. Seeing as how we will have a hard time folding with any hand with value (given stack sizes), he can assume that his remaining $650 will get paid off on the river if he hits thus fully justifying his turn chase.
This seems just as conceivable to me as him having Tx or 88-99 and looking to make a hero call. Not to say he doesn't have those hands. But my first post implied that since both options are viable, I think I go for c/c to reduce the spewiness that the latter has to offer. If the board did not flop a FD than I would absolutely like a river shove. Because now we can't expect him to bluff the river nearly as often and thus we would lose a lot of value on our hand. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
This is why 2p2 becomes close to useless and purely for entertainment once you get to the point where you have the basics down. Every post is either something stupid/easy/obv or one like this where its totally player dependent... a "gray area". Some players will call this with weaker, and some will fold better. VPIP/PFR is no longer enough information to make a good suggestion for hands like this.. "it depends"..
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
So many ppl talking [censored] in this thread, strat wise.
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
i think this is a great play with the right read/history, but against some this is awful.
Also C/c river is really ugly |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: too thin? 5/10
for the results oriented of us, results!
|
|
|