|
|
|
|
#1
11-29-2007, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: deeeeep 50-100, 2 part heads up hand.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] someone explain why 3balling the flop is even a good play vs this villian. [/ QUOTE ] it looks super super bluffy on a board this dry and if he's Cring for value with AJ, how can he fold to this [/ QUOTE ] Wtf do YOU do with AJ? Or how about A 10? [/ QUOTE ] i call flop and check turn at least 90% of the time. this guy does not necssarily have to do that, and us 3-betting should give away kind of a nuts:air idea with the ratio heavily weighted towards air. additionally, calling looks stronger than 3-betting, and he's probably morelikely to bluff shove with 45 here than he is to fire multiple bullets on the turn and the river. also, COMPLETELY irrelevant what i would do, there's liek a 60%+ chance that this guy can just raise AT or any ace for value here, or raise it if he's got Ax with no future plan, he's a random as far as i know. 
|
|
#2
11-29-2007, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: deeeeep 50-100, 2 part heads up hand.
what i'm saying is taht i can't imagine it not being viable to 3-bet to 3450 once in a while
|
|
#3
11-29-2007, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: deeeeep 50-100, 2 part heads up hand.
[ QUOTE ]
what i'm saying is taht i can't imagine it not being viable to 3-bet to 3450 once in a while [/ QUOTE ] yeah but I wouldnt do it against people who dont bluff raise as much as most in this level as it says in the OP. Calling has to be the best flop play. Im good with betting the turn but only if you can fold happily to the check raise because if you really don't know what to do betting is bad. Besides, its unlikely you get two more streets of value out of a majority of his range, and you can possibly catch some river bluffs as well.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
