a 101 man onslaught

[bdiddy12]

This thread has me laughing so hard im crying, but I have no idea what is going on.

[LuckOfTheDraw]

[ QUOTE ]
If it has nothing to do with predicting 4th and 5th street cards at Party Poker then I really could care less.

[/ QUOTE ]

[censored] man! You beat me to it.

[Gary Stevenson]

[ QUOTE ]
This thread has me laughing so hard im crying, but I have no idea what is going on.

[/ QUOTE ]

[neuroman]

[ QUOTE ]
1
4 5 7




9 9 9

9 9 8 9 9








10 9 9




12 21 22
11 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14

14


15 16
17
18
19
20



2 14
14 3 44
















23
24
25 26 27 28 29 30










31







32
32
32
40
32
32
32
32
32 33
32
32
32


34 35 36 37 38

101

39


42
41 44
43
46 45
47 47 48 49 50 51

55 54

56
53
52

57
58

59 60 61 66 62 63 64 63 65 67 36





68

69 70 70

71 71 72 73






74 74 75 76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83

4

84
4
85 88 86

87 85 89 90 90 91






92 92 93 94 95 96

97 98


99 100

[/ QUOTE ]
rigged

[ooinsight]

Spirals are everywhere

[poker-penguin]

[ QUOTE ]
Mornington Crescent Illustrated with Expert Play

Expert Play Made Elementary: A Novice Level Example

Here legendary MC grandmaster Gregory Topov presents some annotations of a four-player game that he presided over as judge in the final of the 1993 British Imperial Cup, in the under 1100 rating Novice Level category. To make the game simple, play was restricted to to the congestion charge zone only, and in the spirit of fair play all players were required to explain their moves, as is commonly the case for games at the novice-level. Other novices to the game may find the following transcript of the game educational.

<font color="blue">Graeme</font>: The traditional opener, like the King’s pawn opening in chess really: <font color="red">Oxford Circus</font>. It is well in the zone, and gives you limited access to Northern parallels. But I suppose it is technically laying an off-side trap there. It could force the next player into Knip if he is not very careful.

<font color="blue">Tim</font>: So I have to play <font color="red">Vauxhall</font>. Basically, things have changed slightly since the Millennium Bridge was put there, so you can back double. So it is actually a Reverse move.

<font color="blue">Barry</font>: I’m going <font color="red">Regents Street</font>, because that is bridging Oxford Circus and Piccadilly Circus. So it is an absolute definitive Lateral, which you can reverse on if the situation is right, so you have a double value. It is a Bridger, and it is a Lateral, a very useful one early on.

<font color="blue">Ross</font>: <font color="red">Mornington Crescent</font>!

Comment: Ross wins the game and earns a triple bonus point for premature exit while in red mode. It will be obvious even to novices that Barry overlooked the fact that aquatic zones are wild during the first turn, and so allowed Ross to use the river crossing for early development and force a comfortable and quick win.

[/ QUOTE ]

That game really is a classic - we had a couple games over on POG actually a couple weeks ago but nothing close to this level.

[klepto]

there's a guy here at UCSB that randomly passes out flyers with all his theories on the world. he lives in the park. he's never stopped taking LSD. the flyer is one long stream of conciousness that makes absolutely no sense.

just thought i should share.

[Runkmud]

How tough would it have been at any point during this whole thread for the OP to just say, it's some mathematical game??? Of course, I could be off, and it might not be a mathematical game, but after 20 quotes, I still have no F'n idea.

[Kneel B4 Zod]

[ QUOTE ]
Mayshaque never took Borak's Retaliation into consideration.

[/ QUOTE ]

obviously, and LOL if you can't figure out why

edited to say - my solution is far superior. this is for a 32 man onslaught, and it's a derivate from Kavovlinmens giant upset in 84.

32





32




32 32 33 32


9












-6


this is pretty elementary Assani.

[Georgia Avenue]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Mayshaque never took Borak's Retaliation into consideration.

[/ QUOTE ]

obviously, and LOL if you can't figure out why

edited to say - my solution is far superior. this is for a 32 man onslaught, and it's a derivate from Kavovlinmens giant upset in 84.

32





32




32 32 33 32


9












-6


this is pretty elementary Assani.

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF? 1998 called and they want their fraudulent onslaught iterations back. Maybe this will fly in the kiddie games, but you step up to the big league 101ers and that Clinton-era junx is worthless.

gg assani,
--GA